Skip to main content
Glama
anhhuyn411-alt

crowd-test-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to crowd-test-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      ▎ Enables AI assistants to unleash a crowd of role-played virtual users — impatient shoppers, seniors, keyboard-only users, privacy hawks, chaos monkeys — on a website. Each persona browses in a real Chromium browser, files UX/QA findings in character, and the site receives a damage report with an S–F survival grade. Accusations can be cross-examined by up to three independent verification engines
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-powered exploratory QA agent. Explores web apps like a real user — 18 MCP tools for clicking, filling forms, and navigating. Automatically verifies that actions persist (fake deletes, failed edits). Runs 16 detection types including dead links, SEO, accessibility, and performance checks.
      29
      68 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to conduct UX reviews of web applications, detecting and fixing AI-generated design and usability issues while preserving the original style.
      18
      1,028 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Simulates real users navigating your app and delivers qualitative UX feedback, including persona-driven testing, auto-friction detection, and WCAG accessibility audits.
      14
      98 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: listing personas, previewing mob members, and reading reports. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern consistently (list_personas, preview_mob, read_report).

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 3 tools, the server is thin but appropriate for a focused utility that augments an external test runner. The count is slightly under but reasonable for the scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover listing, previewing, and reading reports, but there is no tool to execute the crowd test itself, which is a notable gap given the server's purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues