hyprcu
Related Servers
Alternatives to hyprcu
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables an AI agent to see and control a Linux desktop via Wayland/Hyprland, providing screenshots, structured desktop state, pointer/keyboard input, semantic window/workspace tools, and a policy engine for safe execution.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Hyprland that enables AI agents to control workspaces, windows, mouse, keyboard, and take screenshots on a Wayland desktop.14249 PyPI24MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to automate a Linux desktop natively on Wayland, with 68 tools for screen capture, input simulation, browser automation, OCR, accessibility, media, audio, clipboard, notifications, filesystem, system, memory, and network operations through the MCP protocol.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceCross-platform desktop automation MCP server that lets AI agents capture screenshots, run OCR with UI-element classification, control mouse/keyboard, and launch programs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.201-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to automate Hyprland desktop environments through screenshots, mouse/keyboard input, window management, workspaces, clipboard, app launching, and OCR.271MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to capture screenshots, inspect windows, and interact with the Hyprland desktop environment through mouse clicks and keyboard input.1-
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a distinct capability: hypr for compositor window/workspace ops, desktop for state snapshots, screenshot/zoom for capture, ui/marks/click_ui for accessibility-driven interaction, pointer/keyboard for raw input, binds/use_bind for user-defined shortcuts, wait_for for events, launch for starting apps, and sequence for batching. Overlaps are minimal and clearly delineated (e.g., click_ui vs pointer).
Names are a mix of single-word nouns (desktop, ui, marks, binds, pointer, keyboard, sequence) and verbs (launch, zoom, screenshot), plus compound verb-noun forms (wait_for, click_ui, use_bind). The inconsistency is not chaotic but lacks a uniform pattern like verb_noun throughout.
14 tools is well-scoped for a desktop automation server covering input, capture, state, events, launching, and UI interaction. Each tool has a clear role with no redundancy, and the count is neither thin nor bloated.
The surface covers the full lifecycle of desktop automation: observing (desktop, screenshot, zoom), interacting (pointer, keyboard, click_ui, hypr), waiting for changes (wait_for), launching (launch), and executing user workflows (binds, use_bind). No obvious gaps for the stated purpose of controlling Hyprland desktops.