get_action_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'retrieve detailed steps,' which is a read operation, but it does not mention side effects, error behavior, version fallback semantics, or any permissions/rate limits. The description adds little beyond the tool's name and schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word earns its place, making it appropriately concise and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with two parameters and an output schema, so the description doesn't need to explain return values. However, the lack of annotations and absence of guidance about when to use this over related tools (e.g., list_action_templates) leaves gaps. It is adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both 'keyword' and 'version' already described in the schema. The description's mention of 'by keyword' aligns with the schema but adds no new meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate because the schema fully documents the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Retrieve detailed steps for a specific action template by keyword.' It identifies the verb (retrieve), the resource (detailed steps for a specific action template), and the method (by keyword). This unambiguously distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_action_templates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a specific keyword and need detailed steps, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide any exclusions. The phrase 'by keyword' gives a prerequisite but no comparison to siblings like list_action_templates.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.