ndfc_logout
Log out from NDFC and clear the JWT token to close the authenticated session.
Instructions
Logout from NDFC and clear JWT token.
Returns:
Dict with success status
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Log out from NDFC and clear the JWT token to close the authenticated session.
Logout from NDFC and clear JWT token.
Returns:
Dict with success status
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It states 'clear JWT token' but does not describe side effects, failure modes, or prerequisite state (e.g., must be logged in). Lacks some detail but is sufficient for a simple logout.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with the main purpose, no unnecessary words. Highly concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple zero-parameter logout tool without output schema, the description covers purpose and result. Missing is the prerequisite of an active login session, but overall adequate for its complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The baseline for no parameters is 4, and the description adds no parameter information beyond the schema, which is acceptable.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Logout' and the resource 'NDFC', and it distinguishes itself from the sibling tool 'ndfc_login' by being the complementary operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; usage is implied as the counterpart to ndfc_login, but no when-not-to-use or alternative exclusions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/angoran/git-netai'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server