A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server that enables LLMs to interact with ERPNext/Frappe sites for document CRUD, search, reports, workflows, and analytics, respecting user permissions and logging all actions.
324
AGPL 3.0
Frappe LMS MCP Server
by anggun-indra
Related Servers
Alternatives to Frappe LMS MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to interact with the Moodle platform to manage courses, students, assignments, and quizzes.715 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to interact with Moodle platforms to manage courses, students, assignments, and quizzes through natural language commands.715 npm43MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA governed MCP server for ERPNext that provides AI agents with access to 51 doctypes and 265 tools through a PLAN-CONSENT-EXECUTE-PROVE workflow, deny-by-default.5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Moodle that lets AI agents publish and manage pedagogical content — courses, lessons, quizzes, forums — via Moodle Web Services with idempotency.45MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude, ChatGPT, and other LLMs to interact with ERPNext sites through natural language, supporting document CRUD, search, reports, workflows, and custom tools, while respecting user permissions and logging all calls.AGPL 3.0
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 39 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes (courses, chapters, lessons, quizzes, enrollments, batches, connections). However, overlap exists between cached vs live course tools (list_cached_courses vs list_courses) and content-building utilities (build_lesson_content vs add_paragraph_to_content), which could cause minor confusion.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tool names generally follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_course, list_quizzes). There are some deviations like embed_quiz_in_lesson and reupload_course, and mix of 'get' vs 'list' for retrieval, but overall pattern is recognizable and predictable.
Tool Count3/5
39 tools is high for an MCP server, covering many LMS operations plus caching and connection management. While the domain is broad, some tools like add_paragraph_to_content and list_operation_logs feel like utilities that could be integrated or removed, making the set slightly bloated.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers CRUD for courses, chapters, lessons, quizzes, enrollments, and batches. Missing are updates for quizzes and questions (e.g., no update_quiz or delete_question), which are minor gaps. Caching and import/export features add extra completeness for migration scenarios.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues