PagerDuty MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to PagerDuty MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with PagerDuty services, incidents, schedules, and on-call management through natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables PagerDuty incident response operations including listing incidents, acknowledging and resolving incidents, looking up on-call schedules, and listing services.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables read-only access to AlertOps incident alerting and on-call data, including alerts, users, groups, integrations, and schedules, for AI assistants.11-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage a Statuser account directly, including monitoring servers, handling incidents, publishing status page updates, and configuring notifications.871,112 npm22MIT

pagerduty-mcpofficial
AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceEnables management of PagerDuty incidents, services, schedules, and more directly from MCP-enabled clients, with embedded interactive UIs for incident command center, on-call management, and other features.6379Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects Claude to PagerDuty Workflow Automation (formerly Catalytic), enabling discovery of workflows, triggering runs with inputs, and monitoring or aborting running instances.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: specific incident retrieval, user-specific incident listing, general listing, and incident lifecycle actions (acknowledge, resolve, note) are clearly separated. Specialized views like alerts and timeline also have unique purposes with no overlap.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_incident, resolve_incident, list_incidents). The only slight deviation is get_my_incidents and get_oncall, but they still fit the verb_noun convention clearly.
With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for incident management and on-call visibility. Each tool serves a distinct purpose without redundancy or unnecessary bloat.
The server covers the core incident lifecycle: list, view, acknowledge, resolve, add notes, plus related context (alerts, timeline, on-call). However, it lacks the ability to create or reassign incidents, which are common operational actions, representing a minor gap.