agentic-platform
Related Servers
Alternatives to agentic-platform
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAudits AI agent skills for safety using static, semantic, adversarial, and supply-chain analysis, providing scores and risk flags. Can be run via CLI, CI, or as an MCP tool from Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceQuantitative governance gate for AI agents. Six gates (risk, profit, novelty, complexity, quality, utility) return PROCEED/PAUSE/HALT/ESCALATE with confidence scores and hash-chained, tamper-evident audit trails. Generates NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act Annex IV artifacts. 10 MCP tools; local stdio and hosted Streamable HTTP with a free tier.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceFree MCP tools for context engineering audits of AI agents, offering on-demand analysis of system prompts, tool definitions, and context packing.318 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceGovernance primitives for autonomous agents. Verify actions against policy, record signed provenance, and bind intents cryptographically. Free tier available.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOn-chain trust verification for AI agent tools. Agents query skill attestations, audit levels, and risk scores before running third-party MCP servers, so you know what's safe before you execute.1-

DingDawg Governanceofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceFail-closed AI agent governance — approve or block agent actions in real time, score compliance risk, and generate tamper-evident receipts. Free tier: 10 governed actions/day. Upgrade for unlimited + Ed25519-signed audit receipts.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes: health check, buying credits, usage tracking, cost estimation, skill retrieval, skill listing, MCP linting, and registration. However, 'get_skill' and 'list_skills' are closely related and could potentially be confused if an agent needs to understand their exact relationship, though their descriptions clarify this.
The naming follows a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb-noun structures (e.g., 'agent_health_check', 'buy_credits', 'list_skills'). Minor deviations include 'mcp_manifest_lint' which uses an acronym and could be more consistent, but overall the naming is predictable and readable.
With 8 tools, the count is well-scoped for an agentic platform covering configuration diagnostics, billing, usage monitoring, cost estimation, skill management, and MCP tool validation. Each tool serves a clear, non-redundant function, making the set appropriately sized for the domain.
The toolset covers key areas like agent configuration, billing, usage, cost analysis, and skill management, with no major gaps for core workflows. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for updating or managing registered accounts beyond initial registration, but agents can likely work around this with existing tools.