Skip to main content
Glama
andymillar84-cyber

mcp-cliniko

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-cliniko

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive integration with the Cliniko API for healthcare practice management, including patient, appointment, and invoice administration. It enables tools for complex clinical workflows and direct access to practice resources through the Model Context Protocol.
      27
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables integration with the Cliniko practice management system through MCP tools and resources. Supports patient management, appointment scheduling, and practice data access through natural language interactions.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Athena Health's API for comprehensive healthcare practice management. Supports appointment scheduling, provider and department management, patient search, and available slot discovery through natural language.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes tools from the Ecuro Light API for managing clinical appointments, patient records, and clinic availability. It enables users to perform healthcare management tasks such as scheduling, patient search, and report generation through MCP-compatible clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to access IntakeQ practice management data including scheduling, intake forms, treatment notes, invoices, and client records with HIPAA-compliant audit logging.
      22
      41 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes the Feegow clinic management API as MCP tools for agents, enabling scheduling, patient management, and more via natural language.
      97
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (patients, appointments, invoices) with clear purposes. However, cleanup_test_data and cleanup_comprehensive_test_data are very similar, and demo_invoice_generation overlaps with how_to_create_invoices in providing guidance.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_patient, list_appointments, delete_patient). No mixing of styles or ambiguous verbs.

    Tool Count3/5

    27 tools is slightly high for a healthcare practice server. Multiple test data generation and cleanup tools add redundancy, and several invoice tools are read-only due to API limitations, reducing effective utility. A more streamlined set (around 15-20) would be better.

    Completeness4/5

    CRUD operations are covered for patients and appointments, along with listings and searches. Invoice operations are read-only but acknowledged. Missing features like appointment notes or patient tags are minor given the domain focus.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues