Skip to main content
Glama
andychinghk01

db-query-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to db-query-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server providing safe, read-only access to MySQL databases. It enables users to query multiple MySQL instances securely while preventing write operations.
      633 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that enables safe, read-only SQL SELECT queries against PostgreSQL databases with built-in security validation. It features connection pooling, automatic row limits, and structured logging to ensure secure and reliable database interactions.
      47 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for SQL databases (SQLite/PostgreSQL) that enables listing tables, describing schemas, and executing SELECT queries with safety guardrails.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for SQL databases (SQL Server, Postgres, SQLite) with multi-server support and three-layer safety using AST validation and linting.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides safe, read-only SQL access for AI agents to query databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) with schema awareness and guardrails.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables secure, read-only access to MySQL databases with structured query tools, and optional opt-in write operations when explicitly enabled.
      392 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct roles: list_db for discovery and query for executing SQL. There is no overlap in their purposes or outputs.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use a verb-first pattern, but list_db is verb_noun while query is just a verb. This is a minor deviation and still predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the set feels thin, though each earns its place for the stated read-only query purpose. The count is at the lower boundary of typical MCP servers.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface fully covers the domain of read-only database querying: listing available databases and executing arbitrary SELECT/SHOW/DESCRIBE/EXPLAIN statements. No critical gaps exist.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues