Skip to main content
Glama
andsopwn

Wireshark MCP

by andsopwn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wireshark MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • wireshark-mcp

      MrDadpool
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local LLM clients to capture and analyze network traffic using Wireshark's CLI tools, providing packet summaries, protocol hierarchies, conversations, endpoints, expert info, and stream reassembly without shell access.
      12
      MIT

    • pcap-mcp

      jiadewoer
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely investigate packet captures through Wireshark's tshark engine, with bounded tools for protocol inventory, TCP failure diagnosis, latency measurement, and threat hunting.
      12
      MIT

    • noc-pcap-mcp-server

      anthonylouschwank
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM-based assistants to diagnose network problems from PCAP/PCAPNG packet captures, offering tools for capture summaries, TCP conversation analysis, security anomaly detection, and JSON-RPC extraction without requiring Wireshark.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 76 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are grouped with clear prefixes (capture_, stats_, llm_, etc.), and within each group, actions are distinct. Some overlap exists between llm summary tools and stats tools, but descriptions differentiate them sufficiently.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use consistent snake_case naming with informative prefixes, making the function clear. The pattern is uniform across all 76 tools.

    Tool Count2/5

    76 tools is excessive for most use cases, even considering the breadth of Wireshark. The sheer number can overwhelm LLM context windows and cause selection errors, scoring poorly against the calibration where 25+ is considered too many.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers nearly every aspect of capture management, file operations, packet analysis, statistics, transformations, and LLM-oriented summaries. It includes advanced features like sharkd sessions and heuristic dissection, leaving few obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources