Skip to main content
Glama
andreycretsu

Cursor Talk to Figma MCP

by andreycretsu

move_node

Reposition design elements in Figma by specifying new X and Y coordinates, enabling precise layout adjustments through programmatic control.

Instructions

Move a node to a new position in Figma

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nodeIdYesThe ID of the node to move
xYesNew X position
yYesNew Y position

Implementation Reference

  • The MCP tool handler for 'move_node'. It takes nodeId, x, y parameters, sends a 'move_node' command to the Figma plugin via WebSocket (using sendCommandToFigma), and returns a success message with the node name or an error.
    server.tool(
      "move_node",
      "Move a node to a new position in Figma",
      {
        nodeId: z.string().describe("The ID of the node to move"),
        x: z.number().describe("New X position"),
        y: z.number().describe("New Y position"),
      },
      async ({ nodeId, x, y }) => {
        try {
          const result = await sendCommandToFigma("move_node", { nodeId, x, y });
          const typedResult = result as { name: string };
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Moved node "${typedResult.name}" to position (${x}, ${y})`,
              },
            ],
          };
        } catch (error) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Error moving node: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)
                  }`,
              },
            ],
          };
        }
      }
    );
  • Input schema for the 'move_node' tool using Zod validation: nodeId (string), x (number), y (number).
    {
      nodeId: z.string().describe("The ID of the node to move"),
      x: z.number().describe("New X position"),
      y: z.number().describe("New Y position"),
    },
  • Registration of the 'move_node' MCP tool on the McpServer instance, including name, description, input schema, and handler function.
    server.tool(
      "move_node",
      "Move a node to a new position in Figma",
      {
        nodeId: z.string().describe("The ID of the node to move"),
        x: z.number().describe("New X position"),
        y: z.number().describe("New Y position"),
      },
      async ({ nodeId, x, y }) => {
        try {
          const result = await sendCommandToFigma("move_node", { nodeId, x, y });
          const typedResult = result as { name: string };
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Moved node "${typedResult.name}" to position (${x}, ${y})`,
              },
            ],
          };
        } catch (error) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Error moving node: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)
                  }`,
              },
            ],
          };
        }
      }
    );
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states the tool performs a mutation ('move'), but doesn't disclose behavioral traits such as permissions required, whether the move is reversible, effects on other nodes, error conditions, or rate limits. The description is minimal and misses critical context for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It's front-loaded with the core action and resource, making it easy to parse. Every word contributes to the purpose without redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on behavioral aspects, error handling, return values, and how it fits with sibling tools. For a tool that modifies Figma nodes, more context is needed to ensure safe and correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with clear parameter descriptions in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond implying positional movement, which is already covered by the schema's 'x' and 'y' descriptions. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting, but the description doesn't compensate or enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('move') and resource ('a node') with specific context ('to a new position in Figma'). It distinguishes from siblings like 'resize_node' or 'delete_node' by focusing on positional changes, though it doesn't explicitly contrast with them. The purpose is unambiguous but could be more specific about what constitutes a 'node' in Figma.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., needing node permissions), when not to use it (e.g., for non-positional changes), or how it relates to siblings like 'resize_node' or 'set_layout_mode'. Usage is implied by the action but lacks explicit context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/andreycretsu/cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp-main'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server