Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agentmemo-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that gives AI coding agents persistent memory and controlled commands. Features a git-backed markdown knowledge vault with FTS5 search, surgical section edits, token-aware context budgeting, and a sandboxed command engine with human approval gates. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, and more.
      4
      58
      249 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP-native agent memory server. Gives AI agents persistent, decay-weighted memory via 83 MCP tools — no cloud, full control. RocksDB+HNSW backend. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.
      14
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent memory API for AI agents — store, recall, and inject semantically-searchable context across sessions. EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant. Supports Claude, Cursor, Cline, and any MCP-compatible client.
      4
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent, auditable memory for AI agents. Hybrid BM25 + vector recall with 18 MCP tools, adaptive block metadata (A-MEM), intent-aware routing, contradiction detection, and governance workflows. Zero external dependencies. Drop-in memory for Claude Code and any MCP-compatible agent.
      327 PyPI
      17
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: check_approval and request_approval handle approval workflows, while forget, list_memories, recall, and remember manage memory operations. The descriptions make it easy to differentiate between approval and memory tools, and within each category, the actions are well-defined (e.g., recall vs. remember).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., check_approval, list_memories, request_approval) with no deviations in style or casing. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy for an agent to navigate, enhancing usability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for its memory and approval management domain. Each tool serves a specific, necessary function without redundancy, making the count appropriate and efficient for handling core workflows like storing, retrieving, and managing memories, along with human-in-the-loop approvals.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for the memory and approval domain: it includes create (remember), read (recall, list_memories), delete (forget), and approval lifecycle (request_approval, check_approval). There are no obvious gaps, ensuring agents can perform all essential operations without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues