agentmemo-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to agentmemo-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceCognitive memory for AI agents. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible client.21279 PyPI24MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that gives AI coding agents persistent memory and controlled commands. Features a git-backed markdown knowledge vault with FTS5 search, surgical section edits, token-aware context budgeting, and a sandboxed command engine with human approval gates. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, and more.458249 npm1Apache 2.0

dakera-mcpofficial
FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP-native agent memory server. Gives AI agents persistent, decay-weighted memory via 83 MCP tools — no cloud, full control. RocksDB+HNSW backend. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent.148-- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenancePersistent, local memory for AI coding agents that learns how you work, not just what you said. Supports Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, and any MCP client.76580 PyPI68MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePersistent memory API for AI agents — store, recall, and inject semantically-searchable context across sessions. EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant. Supports Claude, Cursor, Cline, and any MCP-compatible client.42MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenancePersistent, auditable memory for AI agents. Hybrid BM25 + vector recall with 18 MCP tools, adaptive block metadata (A-MEM), intent-aware routing, contradiction detection, and governance workflows. Zero external dependencies. Drop-in memory for Claude Code and any MCP-compatible agent.327 PyPI17Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: check_approval and request_approval handle approval workflows, while forget, list_memories, recall, and remember manage memory operations. The descriptions make it easy to differentiate between approval and memory tools, and within each category, the actions are well-defined (e.g., recall vs. remember).
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., check_approval, list_memories, request_approval) with no deviations in style or casing. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy for an agent to navigate, enhancing usability.
With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for its memory and approval management domain. Each tool serves a specific, necessary function without redundancy, making the count appropriate and efficient for handling core workflows like storing, retrieving, and managing memories, along with human-in-the-loop approvals.
The tool set provides complete coverage for the memory and approval domain: it includes create (remember), read (recall, list_memories), delete (forget), and approval lifecycle (request_approval, check_approval). There are no obvious gaps, ensuring agents can perform all essential operations without dead ends.