Delete Memory

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds context beyond annotations: confirms permanence, irreversible action, and safe no-op for non-existent memories. Annotations already indicate destructive and idempotent, but description reinforces and explains edge cases.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four succinct sentences, front-loaded with purpose, args and return clearly separated. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description explains return value (boolean with 'deleted' key), covers edge case of non-existent memory, and notes irreversibility. No output schema, but description compensates fully.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description provides 'kebab-case slug' which aligns with schema pattern, but adds no significant new meaning beyond the schema property description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Permanently delete a memory by name', uses specific verb+resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools (get, list, search, write).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Indicates that deletion is permanent and cannot be undone, and explains the no-op behavior for non-existent memories. Does not explicitly exclude alternative tools, but context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.