Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Oculus MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to observe local codebases in real time through a secure, read-only MCP interface, providing workspace snapshots, git history and diffs, cross-project search, and project reality coverage without write access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only local MCP server for inspecting AgentInspect TypeScript AI-agent traces. Lists runs, exposes bounded causal-failure and TraceFacts evidence, evaluates TraceContract checks, compares runs, and creates share-checked evidence without mutating traces or invoking agent tools.
      777 npm
      165
      MIT
    • F
      license
      D
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, structured access to Yasin ecosystem information (project registry, documentation, GitHub state, diagnostics) through the MCP protocol, enabling AI agents to query without direct repository access.
      22
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets AI assistants inspect local workspace files, search context, view git diffs, and fetch a fixed GitHub profile, all within a sandboxed stdio transport.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure, local-first MCP server for read-only inspection and troubleshooting of development environments, exposing narrow, typed, auditable capabilities for repository inspection, log summarization, Docker review, and security scanning without granting unrestricted machine access.
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The list_* tools target distinct resources (projects, inspections, saved items), and get_inspection_context has a specific retrieval role. However, list_inspections and list_saved_items both concern persisted metadata, which could cause minor initial ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case with clear list_ or get_ prefixes and noun phrases. The pattern is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is lean but reasonable for a focused read-only inspection and cache server. Each tool covers a distinct read operation, though the surface could potentially benefit from additional targeted operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover listing tracked projects, inspections, saved items, and retrieving cached inspection context, but there are no create, update, delete, or refresh operations for these entities. This may be intentional for a read-only surface, but notable lifecycle gaps remain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues