export_image

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only mentions 'high-quality rendered images' and usage contexts, but fails to disclose whether the operation modifies the model, requires specific permissions, or what happens to existing files. Lacks transparency about side effects or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two short sentences. The first sentence front-loads the core purpose, and the second adds context. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (not shown) and many optional parameters, the description provides minimal context. It mentions the tool's purpose and use cases but does not indicate prerequisites (e.g., model must be open) or default behavior. Adequate but could be improved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The tool description does not add additional meaning beyond what the input schema already provides for individual parameters. It does not explain which parameters are important or how they interact.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Export images') and the target resource ('current model'), specifying it's for SolidWorks models and high-quality rendered images. It distinguishes from sibling export tools (e.g., export_step, export_pdf) by focusing on image formats and visual documentation uses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides use cases (documentation, presentations, marketing, web publication) but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like export_pdf or other image-related tools. No 'when not to use' guidance or sibling comparisons are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.