Skip to main content
Glama
andresthor

Command-Line MCP Server

by andresthor

Related Servers

Alternatives to Command-Line MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to execute terminal commands on a host machine with configurable, granular permission controls and safety protections. It features multiple security modes, including allowlists and manual approval, to ensure safe command execution within specified directories.
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables safe execution of terminal commands across different shells (bash, cmd, PowerShell) with configurable timeouts, working directories, and resource limits for command-line operations through AI assistants.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to execute shell commands on a host macOS computer with configurable file access permissions, granting access to credentials and tools while enforcing sandbox restrictions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely execute remote SSH commands, perform file transfers, and monitor system status through a standardized interface. It features robust security controls including command whitelisting, blacklisting, and credential isolation to prevent unauthorized operations.
      10
      11 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely execute shell commands on local machines through an SSH interface with session management, command execution, and sudo support.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have mostly distinct purposes: execute_command and execute_read_command overlap in executing commands, but the read-only distinction is meaningful for permission safety. Approval tools are clearly differentiated by type vs directory. Help and listing tools are distinct. No major confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, approve_, execute_, list_). No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools is well-scoped for a command-line execution server with permission management. Each tool serves a clear purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    Core functionality (execute, approve, list, get help/config) is covered. However, there is no tool to revoke approvals or reset session permissions, which could be a minor gap for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow