Skip to main content
Glama
andresolbach

nodriver-mcp-server

Use temporary profile

use_temp_profile
DestructiveIdempotent

Switch to a fresh ephemeral browser profile to start a clean session, preventing data residue and collision between concurrent instances.

Instructions

Switch back to a fresh ephemeral profile, created and deleted per session.

This is the default. It leaves nothing behind on disk and lets many nodriver instances run concurrently without colliding on a profile directory.

Restarts the browser and closes all open pages. The profile you are leaving is not deleted — a persistent one keeps its cookies for the next use_profile. Anything held in the outgoing temp profile is gone.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
browserNoWhich browser to act on. Each name is an independent Chrome, created on first use. Omit for the shared default; parallel agents each need their own name.default

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.5.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / browser
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "default",
      +  "description": "Which browser to act on. Each name is an independent Chrome, created on first use. Omit for the shared default; parallel agents each need their own name.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observedv1.7.2

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the destructiveHint and idempotentHint annotations, the description discloses concrete side effects: it restarts the browser, closes all open pages, leaves nothing on disk, and destroys anything held in the outgoing temp profile. It also clarifies that leaving a persistent profile does not delete it, which helps the agent anticipate state changes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded: the core purpose appears in the first sentence, followed by key behavioral facts. Each sentence contributes meaningful information without padding or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one optional parameter and an output schema, the description covers everything an agent needs: what the tool does, its default status, concurrency benefits, restart/closing behavior, and the persistence of the previous profile. Nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single browser parameter is fully documented in the schema with 100% coverage, so the description does not need to explain it. The description adds no extra parameter-level meaning, which matches the baseline expectation for a fully covered schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Switch back to a fresh ephemeral profile') and clearly identifies the resource being acted on. It distinguishes itself from persistent-profile siblings like use_profile by emphasizing ephemerality and per-session deletion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains that this tool is the default and contrasts it with the persistent profile behavior of use_profile, letting an agent infer when to choose each. It stops short of an explicit 'use this when X, use use_profile when Y' rule, but the context is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.