mem0-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to mem0-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server wrapping a self-hosted mem0 REST API, enabling memory management with deduplication and mention-aware reranked search.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA custom MCP server that connects to self-hosted Mem0 API instances, enabling Claude Code to manage memories via custom endpoints.41MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA personal memory MCP server for Claude Code that stores and retrieves memories via natural language, supporting text, images, files, and secrets with vector search.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code that enables long-term recall across sessions via hybrid search, code intelligence, and tools for reading/writing memory.51MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA zero-dependency MCP server for cross-session memory recall in Claude Code. Provides lexical search, listing, and retrieval of past session memories to avoid re-explaining context.316MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSelf-hosted mem0 MCP server for Claude Code. Run a complete memory server against self-hosted Qdrant + Neo4j + Ollama while using Claude as the main LLM.11107MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list, get, add, search, update, and delete memories. There is no functional overlap; even get vs list are differentiated by retrieval method (by ID vs. enumeration).
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, add_, search_, update_, delete_). Minor singular/plural variation (memory vs memories) is natural and does not affect predictability.
With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for a memory management system. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy or bloat.
The tool set provides full CRUD coverage (add, get, update, delete) plus list and semantic search. There are no missing lifecycle operations for the stated purpose.