planka_delete_custom_field_group
Remove a custom field group from your Planka board by providing its ID.
Instructions
Delete a custom field group.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | Yes |
Remove a custom field group from your Planka board by providing its ID.
Delete a custom field group.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description only says 'Delete' without disclosing side effects (e.g., impact on cards), auth requirements, or irreversibility.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise, but could include additional context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description lacks return value info, constraints, or operational context, making it insufficient for confident use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Parameter description in input schema already explains the required ID; tool description adds no new semantic value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Delete a custom field group' using specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from create, update, and get siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., planka_update_custom_field_group), no prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/andrejberg/ya-planka-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server