noteker
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@notekertranscribe ~/Downloads/lecture-notes.pdf"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Noteker
Noteker is a macOS MCP server that converts handwritten PDF notes into clean Markdown using Claude Vision. Give it a PDF, get back structured text — no OCR engine, no separate models, no setup beyond an Anthropic API key.
Designed for notes exported from Noteshelf3 on iPad, but works with any handwritten PDF.
How it works
Claude ──MCP stdio──▶ noteker
│
┌──────────▼──────────┐
│ PyMuPDF │
│ PDF → PNG per page │
└──────────┬──────────┘
│
┌──────────▼──────────┐
│ Claude Vision API │
│ transcribe + format │
└──────────┬──────────┘
│
clean Markdown ──▶ ClaudeEach page is rendered to an image and sent to Claude Vision, which transcribes the handwriting and formats it as Markdown in a single pass. Blank pages are skipped automatically. Pages are processed in batches of at most 5 — requests spanning more pages are automatically split into sequential batches and stitched back into one combined Markdown result.
Both tools are read-only: they never modify the source PDF or any other file.
Related MCP server: pdf2md-mcp
Tools
Tool | Description |
| Transcribe a local PDF of handwritten notes. Returns clean Markdown. |
| Return version, config path, and whether the API key is set. |
Installation
As a Claude Desktop extension (recommended)
Download the latest
noteker-x.y.z.mcpbfrom the Releases page.Double-click it (or drag it into Claude Desktop → Settings → Extensions) to install.
When prompted, paste your Anthropic API key — Claude Desktop stores it securely and passes it to Noteker as
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY.
That's it — no separate config file or MCP registration step needed. Extra settings (model, max_pages, dpi) are still read from ~/.noteker/config/settings.yaml if you want to override the defaults (see Configuration).
From source
Requirements: Python 3.11+, macOS
git clone https://github.com/andras-tkcs/noteker
cd noteker
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e .Copy and edit the config:
cp config/settings.yaml.example config/settings.yaml
# Edit config/settings.yaml — add your Anthropic API keyRegister Noteker with Claude (see MCP registration) using the path .venv/bin/noteker.
Configuration
Config file location:
Context | Path |
Claude Desktop extension |
|
From source |
|
Override | Set |
anthropic:
# API key from console.anthropic.com → API Keys
# Can also be set via the ANTHROPIC_API_KEY environment variable.
api_key: sk-ant-api03-...
# Model used for transcription.
# claude-sonnet-4-6 is recommended. Use claude-opus-4-8 for very difficult handwriting.
model: claude-sonnet-4-6
noteker:
# Maximum pages to process per PDF (safety cap).
max_pages: 50
# Rendering resolution. 150 DPI works well for most handwriting.
# Increase to 200 if the handwriting is very small.
dpi: 150
logging:
level: INFOAnthropic API key
Create a key at console.anthropic.com → API Keys. It looks like sk-ant-api03-....
You can set it in settings.yaml as shown above, or export it as an environment variable — Noteker checks both:
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-api03-...Adding the export to ~/.zshrc means you never need it in the config file.
MCP registration
The Claude Desktop extension registers itself — no manual JSON editing needed.
For Claude Code CLI, add Noteker to the project's .claude/settings.json (the .mcpb format doesn't apply to Claude Code, which always uses a direct command path):
{
"mcpServers": {
"noteker": {
"command": "/absolute/path/to/noteker/.venv/bin/noteker"
}
}
}Or, with the API key passed directly instead of via settings.yaml:
{
"mcpServers": {
"noteker": {
"command": "/absolute/path/to/noteker/.venv/bin/noteker",
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "sk-ant-api03-..."
}
}
}
}After saving the config, restart Claude Code (or reload MCP servers) and run noteker_status() to confirm the setup.
Usage
A typical session with both Noteker and Loopline:
# 1. Find the PDF on Google Drive (via loopline)
drive_list_files(query="name contains 'Meeting Notes' and mimeType='application/pdf'")
→ file_id: "1aBcD..."
# 2. Download it locally (via loopline — drive_save_to_path)
drive_save_to_path(file_id="1aBcD...")
→ /Users/you/Downloads/Meeting Notes 2025-06-20.pdf
# 3. Transcribe the handwriting (via noteker)
noteker_process_pdf(
file_path="/Users/you/Downloads/Meeting Notes 2025-06-20.pdf",
note_context="product team standup"
)
→ ## Page 1
### Action items
- Follow up with design on the onboarding flow
...Noteker is source-agnostic — any local PDF works, regardless of how it got there.
Building the .mcpb
./scripts/build_mcpb.shOutput: noteker-<version>.mcpb. The build script creates a virtual environment at server/venv with all dependencies installed, so the extension has no runtime dependency on uv or pip. It still links against the Python 3.13 framework install used to build it, and PyMuPDF ships arch-specific wheels — build on the same OS/CPU architecture (arm64 macOS) you're targeting.
License
Apache 2.0 — see LICENSE.
Available Tools
2 toolsnoteker_process_pdfARead-only
Convert a local PDF of handwritten notes into clean Markdown using Claude Vision.
file_path: absolute path to a PDF file on the local filesystem. note_context: optional hint about the content (e.g. 'team meeting 2025-06-20'). Helps Claude resolve ambiguous words. page_start: first page to process (1-based, inclusive). Omit to start from page 1. page_end: last page to process (1-based, inclusive). Omit to process to the last page (capped at max_pages when no range is given).
Pages are sent to Claude Vision in batches of at most 5. Requests spanning more pages are processed as several sequential batches and stitched into one result — the caller always gets back a single combined Markdown document.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_end | No | ||
| file_path | Yes | ||
| page_start | No | ||
| note_context | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description discloses key behavioral traits: batching (max 5 pages per batch), sequential processing across batches, single combined Markdown output, and the optional 'note_context' parameter to aid resolution. The 'readOnlyHint' annotation is not contradicted as the tool does not modify input files. Slightly more detail on the max_pages cap could improve, but it's well-covered.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise and well-structured, using bullet points for parameters and separate sentences for behavior. It delivers all necessary information without fluff, earning its space with every sentence.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, batching logic, output schema exists), the description covers all input aspects and processing behavior clearly. The presence of an output schema reduces the need to describe return values, and the description mentions the final result is a single combined Markdown document, making it complete for an agent to invoke correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description provides thorough explanations for all four parameters: file_path (absolute path), note_context (hint for ambiguous words), page_start (1-based inclusive, default 1), and page_end (inclusive, default last page with cap). It also explains batching behavior, adding significant meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The tool name 'noteker_process_pdf' and description clearly state its function: converting local PDFs of handwritten notes into Markdown using Claude Vision. The verb 'Convert' and resource 'local PDF' are specific, and it implicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling 'noteker_status' which presumably checks status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains when to use it (for converting handwritten note PDFs) and provides contextual details like batching behavior and page range handling. It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the sibling tool 'noteker_status' suggests a clear divide, making usage context adequate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
noteker_statusARead-only
Return Noteker version and configuration status.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
No output parameters | ||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, consistent with a read operation. The description adds detail on what is returned (version and configuration status), enhancing transparency beyond the annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, front-loaded sentence with no waste. Every word is necessary.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, an output schema, and clear read-only annotations, the description is fully adequate for selecting and invoking this simple tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline is 4. The description adds nothing about parameters, but none are needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns 'Noteker version and configuration status,' a specific verb-resource combination. It distinguishes from the sibling 'noteker_process_pdf' which processes PDFs, not status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs others. The description implies usage for status checks but lacks explicit context or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
Only two tools with clearly distinct purposes: one processes PDFs into Markdown, the other returns server status. No overlap whatsoever.
Both tools use the same prefix 'noteker_' and follow a verb_noun pattern ('process_pdf', 'status'), making naming predictable and consistent.
With only two tools, the server is minimal but well-scoped for its stated purpose of converting handwritten notes from PDFs. Slightly low but reasonable.
The core functionality (PDF conversion) is fully covered, and a status tool is provided. Minor gaps like batch processing or format options are absent but not essential.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
High-fidelity PDF to structured Markdown conversion and document field extraction.
PDF tools for Claude: merge, split, compress, convert, OCR & more. Requires a PDFHaul API key.
Convert documents and web pages to clean Markdown: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, EPUB, scanned files, any URL.
Extract PDFs to Markdown, RAG chunks and cited tables; publish tracked Doc Links with read stats.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConverts PDF files from local storage or URLs to structured Markdown format using Mistral AI's OCR API, preserving document structure and extracting images.21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConverts PDF files to Markdown format using AI sampling capabilities.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConverts files (PDF, Word, images, etc.) to Markdown within Claude Desktop to reduce token usage.
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConverts documents and images to Markdown using Mistral AI's OCR, enabling AI-powered document processing via MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.2742MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/andras-tkcs/noteker'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server