Generate visual dashboard

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility. It discloses that the tool generates an HTML dashboard and returns a file path, but does not mention any side effects, authentication requirements, or whether it modifies state. Minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no filler, front-loaded with the core action and result. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description covers the main function and output but misses preconditions (e.g., having recorded usage) and parameter details. It is minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 33% (only 'path' has description). The description does not explain the parameters beyond the implied output path. It does not clarify 'scenario' or 'days' meaning, leaving gaps for an agent to infer.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: building a standalone HTML dashboard from recorded usage data, and returns a file path. The verb 'Build' and resource 'dashboard' are specific, and it distinguishes itself from siblings like 'analyze_efficiency' or 'estimate_impact'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a visual dashboard is needed, but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., for efficiency analysis vs. impact estimation). No when-not-to-use or alternative tools mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.