Skip to main content
Glama
MCP Code Mode

MCP Code Mode

by anaseqal

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Code Mode

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for secure, session-based Python code execution in Docker containers, enabling LLM applications to run code, manage state, and access files.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-grade MCP server providing a persistent Python REPL with multi-session support, sandboxing, and timeout protection, enabling LLM agents to execute Python code across multiple turns with variables that persist between calls.
      12
      31 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server enabling LLMs to execute commands, manage files, interact with Figma, search the web, generate images, and more, extending their capabilities beyond text generation.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables LLMs to run ANY code safely in isolated Docker containers.
      124
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear and distinct purpose. run_python and run_python_stream are differentiated by streaming vs. non-streaming execution. run_with_retry adds retry logic. Learning tools (add_learning, record_semantic_failure) handle different failure types. configure, get_learnings, get_system_context, and pip_install are all unique and unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, e.g., add_learning, run_python, get_system_context. There are no deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a code execution MCP server. It covers execution, learning, configuration, context retrieval, and package management without redundancy or gaps.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows: code execution (with variants), error/semantic learning, configuration, system context, and package installation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to delete or update learnings), but overall it's nearly complete for the stated purpose.