Skip to main content
Glama
analekt

yahoo-furigana-mcp

by analekt
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to yahoo-furigana-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Yomitan MCP Server

      GoRakuDo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with direct access to local Yomitan dictionary databases for offline Japanese vocabulary lookups, kanji searches, and sentence tokenization. It leverages the Yomitan browser extension's API to enable rich dictionary interactions and Anki flashcard field generation.
      5
      4 npm
      6
      Mozilla Public 2.0

    • Torify — Japanese Locale APIs

      torify-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Torify gives AI agents the Japanese locale primitives that standard libraries lack — imperial era date conversion (wareki), qualified invoice number validation with NTA registry lookup, corporate number lookup (法人番号), postal code resolution, name romanization (Hepburn), and kanji-to-kana conversion via Yahoo! JLP. 31 endpoints total. No authentication required for MCP. Pay-per-call $0.02/call via
      MIT

    • yomiage-svr

      shuhei1101
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables text-to-speech synthesis using VOICEVOX characters (ずんだもん, 春日部つむぎ, 四国めたん) and allows querying available speakers and transforming text to character tone.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (gen_furigana) with no mixed naming conventions. Consistency is trivially maintained.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is below the reasonable range for a well-scoped server and feels overly thin, even for a narrow purpose. The rubric explicitly treats 1 tool as too few.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core furigana generation operation for the domain. Minor gaps like configurable output formats or batchprocessing exist but are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources