Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-consultant

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to start new Codex conversations and continue existing threads, exposing codex and codex-reply tools over stdio via the Codex app-server protocol.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and external AI supervisors to oversee and steer native Codex sessions through a thin local stdio bridge. It exposes eleven codex_* supervisory tools for tasks such as listing threads, starting turns, observing progress, steering, responding to approvals, interrupting, checkpointing, and rolling over work.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local stdio MCP server that lets any MCP client start a Codex thread and continue it by opaque thread ID through the codex and codex-reply tools, with fail-closed sandboxing and approval policies. It restores the removed Codex CLI MCP integration by bridging clients like OpenCode to the official Codex SDK.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bridges MCP clients with local Codex CLI to execute autonomous coding tasks, manage threads, and inspect history via SQLite state.
      13
      577 npm
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables continuing a local coding task from your own web ChatGPT account by exposing project-scoped read and apply tools over MCP, with no inference API dependency.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    codex_consult and codex_review both offer read-only Codex input, but review is explicitly scoped to code/project review at a cwd while consult is a general second opinion. codex_continue is clearly distinct. The overlap is minor and descriptions help.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent codex_<verb> pattern with clear, simple verbs (consult, continue, review). No mixed conventions or vague names.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is exactly right for a focused consultant server: ask for a consult, continue it, and request a review. Nothing feels missing or excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    The server's purpose is read-only Codex consultation and review. The tools cover starting a consultation, continuing a thread, and performing a project review—no obvious dead ends or missing operations for this narrow domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues