Skip to main content
Glama
amrsohil

Agent Ransack MCP

by amrsohil

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agent Ransack MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search local files by name, path, metadata, and literal text over MCP on Windows, Linux, and macOS, while keeping searches within explicitly configured directories and running locally over stdio.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search local files on Windows using the Everything search engine, supporting basic and complex file searches with filters like date, size, media type, and document type.
      12 PyPI
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to voidtools' in-memory indexing engine via native Windows IPC for millisecond file and folder searches, with advanced query syntax and tools for recent files, status, and sorted results.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and inspect a Windows machine's local inventory of agents, skills, MCP servers, projects, and cross-agent work records, with tools for full-text search, overviews, project details, and reindexing. All data stays local and only matching snippets enter model context.
      8
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search local files and folders via the Everything search engine, with support for advanced queries, file metadata, text previews, and service status.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so no ambiguity exists. An agent will always select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear snake_case name (search_files_content) which is descriptive and follows a consistent pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only one tool, the server feels minimal. However, for a focused file search purpose, a single comprehensive tool can be sufficient, though it may limit flexibility.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers both filename and content search, including regex. Minor gaps like advanced filtering or archive search may exist, but the core search domain is well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues