Skip to main content
Glama
amrlhakimii

SecKit MCP

by amrlhakimii

Related Servers

Alternatives to SecKit MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform cybersecurity tasks including hash analysis, CVE lookup, HTTP header auditing, WHOIS/OSINT, payload decoding, password strength evaluation, and threat report generation.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform defensive security tasks such as vulnerability detection, CVE lookup, phishing/link safety checks, and security report generation via MCP tools.
      23
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform digital forensics analysis including memory analysis, file metadata inspection, and threat-intelligence lookups.
      3 npm
      ISC
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform cybersecurity analysis including RDAP lookup, DNS analysis, SSL inspection, security header detection, and more, returning structured security reports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect, query, and diagnose projects, deployments, releases, runbooks, tasks, tenants, Kubernetes resources, machines, certificates, accounts, and interruptions, with optional write operations and read-only safeguards.
      266 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask Purple AI hunting questions, run PowerQueries over the Singularity Data Lake, and read alerts, vulnerabilities, misconfigurations and asset inventory from a SentinelOne console, plus VirusTotal and public CVE lookups. It is read-only and accepts per-request console credentials, making it stateless and multi-tenant.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a clearly distinct operation: threat-intel lookups (lookup_cve, explain_mitre_technique, search_mitre), IOC handling (defang_iocs/refang_iocs), log parsing, hashing, and password breach checks. The only near-pair, search_mitre vs explain_mitre_technique, is explicitly differentiated (ranked matches vs full details). An agent can select tools confidently.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All nine tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_password_breach, lookup_cve, parse_log_line, defang_iocs, hash_text, etc.). The defang/refang pair even signals their inverse relationship through naming.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and every tool earns its place by covering a distinct security-analysis task. No redundant or filler tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core SOC workflows: vulnerability and ATT&CK intel, IOC defang/refang, log parsing, event-id explanation, and hashing. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no hash/URL/IP reputation lookup, no encode/decode or base64 tools), but the core lifecycle is solid and workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues