CircleCI MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to CircleCI MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates Harness with GenAI applications via the Model Context Protocol, enabling continuous delivery and cloud cost management through natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Cloudflare services including Workers, KV, R2, D1, Queues, and more via the Model Context Protocol.1,335Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceIntegrates GitLab with AI assistants to manage merge requests, analyze CI/CD pipelines, and create Architecture Decision Records. It enables seamless code searching, pipeline triggering, and deployment management through the Model Context Protocol.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables managing Neon projects, databases, and running SQL queries through natural language via Model Context Protocol.1,016MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and manage GoCD pipelines, stages, and jobs through the Model Context Protocol. It allows users to trigger builds, analyze failures, and access build logs or artifacts using the GoCD REST API.582MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides Jenkins CI/CD integration for AI assistants through the Model Context Protocol, enabling job management, build control, and system administration via natural language commands.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is significant overlap between run_pipeline, run_evaluation_tests, and rerun_workflow, which all involve triggering or re-running CI pipelines. Additionally, analyze_diff and config_helper are somewhat ambiguous as they analyze code/config but aren't clearly part of the core CircleCI domain. An agent might struggle to choose between these overlapping tools.
The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_followed_projects, get_build_failure_logs, run_pipeline). However, there are minor deviations like analyze_diff (verb_noun but not clearly CircleCI-specific) and config_helper (noun_verb pattern), which slightly break the consistency. Overall, naming is mostly predictable and readable.
With 13 tools, the count is reasonable for a CircleCI server, covering monitoring, debugging, and pipeline operations. However, it feels slightly heavy due to redundant pipeline-running tools and some tools (like create_prompt_template) that seem out of scope for a CI/CD server, suggesting the set could be more tightly scoped.
The server covers core CircleCI operations like listing projects, checking status, getting logs, and running pipelines, but there are notable gaps. For example, there are no tools for managing project settings, webhooks, or artifacts, and tools like create_prompt_template and recommend_prompt_template_tests seem unrelated to CircleCI, creating confusion about the domain. This incompleteness may hinder agent workflows.