Skip to main content
Glama
amos689

paper-preflight

Related Servers

Alternatives to paper-preflight

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables auditing of every citation in a LaTeX or Markdown manuscript (English or Portuguese) against the actual passage in the cited PDF, verifying quotes literally, fetching sources from local folders, Zotero, arXiv and open-access APIs, and flagging bibliography problems such as retractions or missing DOIs. It also drafts and safely applies approved rewrites or new evidence-backed paragraphs in the .tex file with validation, encoding preservation and backups.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Checks whether a citation has been retracted, corrected, or flagged with an expression of concern by querying Crossref — including retractions that Crossref backfills from the Retraction Watch database, which publishers often never record in their own metadata. Lets an AI agent verify a DOI, or every DOI in a reference list, before using it in research or writing.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables verifying citations in reference lists and BibTeX by detecting fabricated or mismatched references and retractions, and returning corrected BibTeX.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify manuscript references against public scholarly records, checking that cited works exist, match their citations, and have not been retracted or flagged. It also lets an agent gather the best source passages for each citing sentence and record its own claim-support verdicts back into the report.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Searches academic references from arXiv, DBLP, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex concurrently and generates BibTeX citations.
      4
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct action: verify references, explain a rule, look up a BibTeX entry, propose .bib diffs, and gather cited passages. The check/fix and check/cited_passages pairs are separated by verb (verify vs edit vs ground claims) and the descriptions reinforce the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names share the preflight_ prefix and snake_case form with a predictable verb/noun tail (check, explain, bib_lookup, bib_fix, cited_passages). Minor sub-namespacing (bib_*) does not break the pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools map cleanly onto the whole preflight workflow (check, explain, lookup, fix, evidence-gathering) with no redundancy. The count is well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers verification, rule explanation, record lookup, repair diffs, and claim-to-passage grounding, which is most of a preflight lifecycle. There is no obvious way to enumerate all rules or configure/batch settings, a minor gap agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues