Skip to main content
Glama
amos689

paper-preflight

by amos689
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to paper-preflight

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      Chenle88236
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to check BibTeX records for bibliographic existence and metadata consistency by querying identifier-first providers like Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, DBLP, and arXiv and scoring title, author, year, venue, and page evidence. It returns explainable outcomes such as matches, ambiguous or not-found entries, and identifier conflicts, while keeping edits non-destructive unless explicitly applied.
      -

    • CiteCheck MCP

      lucasgris
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables auditing of every citation in a LaTeX or Markdown manuscript (English or Portuguese) against the actual passage in the cited PDF, verifying quotes literally, fetching sources from local folders, Zotero, arXiv and open-access APIs, and flagging bibliography problems such as retractions or missing DOIs. It also drafts and safely applies approved rewrites or new evidence-backed paragraphs in the .tex file with validation, encoding preservation and backups.
      19
      MIT

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      ozkan40
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and researchers to verify BibTeX entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, arXiv and other sources using identifier-first, explainable multi-signal matching. It reports metadata consistency, conflicts, and ambiguous or missing records, and can apply high-confidence field updates non-destructively with backups.
      -

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      hassan4655
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency in BibTeX files through identifier-first lookups and explainable multi-source matching without destructive edits. It surfaces structured outcomes for missing, ambiguous, or conflicting references and supports non-destructive, high-confidence updates.
      -

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      erikk909
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify bibliographic records and BibTeX metadata consistency by resolving DOI, PMID, PMCID, and arXiv identifiers and scoring candidates across multiple scholarly sources with explainable, multi-signal matching. It reports structured provider outcomes and metadata conflicts without destructively editing the source bibliography.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a genuinely distinct action: whole-paper verification (check), rule explanation (explain), single-entry retrieval (bib_lookup), diff generation (bib_fix), and claim-support evidence (cited_passages). The descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other and clarify scope boundaries (e.g. 'to check a whole bibliography use preflight_check'). No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent 'preflight_' prefix followed by a snake_case noun/verb pattern (preflight_check, preflight_explain, preflight_bib_lookup, preflight_bib_fix, preflight_cited_passages). The convention is predictable and readable throughout, with no style mixing.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a reference-preflight service, and each maps to a clear stage of the workflow (verify, explain, lookup, fix, judge support). Nothing feels redundant or missing at the count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: whole-paper check, rule explanation, single-entry lookup, safe/unsafe fixes, and citation-support evidence. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no bulk bibliography export or cache-management tool), but agents can work around them and core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources