Skip to main content
Glama
mcp-google-health

mcp-google-health

by amitray007

get_irn_profile

Read-only

Retrieves the user's irregular rhythm notification (IRN) enrollment profile, enabling you to verify enrollment status and review settings for irregular rhythm notifications.

Instructions

Get the user's irregular rhythm notification (IRN) enrollment profile.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_irn_profile"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only the resource scope ('IRN enrollment profile') and does not explain what the profile contains, whether it can be empty, or what enrollment states mean. With no output schema, this leaves a meaningful behavioral gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler. It states the action and resource immediately, which is ideal for a zero-parameter getter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple zero-parameter read tool, the description is minimally sufficient because annotations cover safety. However, with no output schema, the description should give at least a hint about the return shape or enrollment semantics; that context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to clarify. The schema is empty and fully consistent with the description; baseline 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Get the user's irregular rhythm notification (IRN) enrollment profile.' It expands the IRN acronym, which helps identify the resource. However, it does not explicitly distinguish this from sibling getters like get_profile or get_identity, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus get_profile, get_identity, get_settings, or get_paired_device. The retrieval purpose is implied, but no alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.