Skip to main content
Glama

CI MCP Node License

Anchor reads a team's interviews, tickets and docs and builds a model of the product — the decisions, the contradictions, and everything nobody has answered. This is that model, exposed to your agent over the Model Context Protocol.

Six tools. All six return the fragments an answer came from, because an answer you cannot check is a guess with better formatting.


Quickstart

Runs with no account, no key and no network, against a bundled sample project. Pick your client:

Claude Code

claude mcp add anchor -- npx -y github:amitboker/anchor-mcp

Claude Desktop — claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "anchor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "github:amitboker/anchor-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Cursor — .cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "anchor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "github:amitboker/anchor-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

VS Code

code --add-mcp '{"name":"anchor","command":"npx","args":["-y","github:amitboker/anchor-mcp"]}'

Restart the client afterwards — all of them read MCP config at boot.

Not on npm yet, so the specs above install from this repository. npx builds it on first run, which takes a few seconds once and is cached after that.


Related MCP server: cortex-brain

Tools

Tool

What it does

ask_brain

Ask a question about the product. Returns the fragments that bear on it, each with its source.

list_contradictions

Statements that cannot both be true, both sides quoted, and the question that resolves each.

list_gaps

Questions no source answers, who can answer them, and what they block.

list_sources

Everything the brain has read, and how many fragments came out of each.

get_fragment

Open one fragment by id — full text and where it sits in its source.

draft

A PRD section, user stories or acceptance criteria, every line traced to a fragment.

What comes back

$ list_contradictions

3 contradictions in checkout-redesign.

## Cart retention window  (c-01)

A. The cart persists for 30 days on an unauthenticated session.
   — prd-checkout-v3 · §3.1 (PRD — Checkout redesign, v3)

B. Unauthenticated carts must expire within 7 days.
   — sec-review-q2 · Findings, item 4 (Security review — payments surface)

→ Does guest checkout keep a 30-day cart and require an identity, or drop
  to a 7-day window and stay anonymous?

Two documents, four months apart, in two different tools. Neither author was wrong. Nobody was going to notice.

Two things it will not do

It does not answer what it has not read:

$ ask_brain "quarterly revenue in Belgium"

Nothing in checkout-redesign answers that.

And it does not draft without sources:

$ draft --kind prd_section --topic "offline sync"

Not drafting "offline sync" — nothing in checkout-redesign supports it.

Both are the product working. A tool that fills a gap it cannot see the bottom of is the failure mode this exists to remove.


Sample data, and real projects

Out of the box the server runs on a bundled fixture — a checkout-redesign project with six sources and ten fragments. Every source, quote and person in it is invented, and every response says so in its footer.

Set ANCHOR_API_KEY and the same six tools read a real Project Brain instead. The output shape does not change; only the data does.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "anchor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "github:amitboker/anchor-mcp"],
      "env": { "ANCHOR_API_KEY": "${ANCHOR_API_KEY}" }
    }
  }
}

Reference the variable from your shell rather than pasting a key into a file you might commit.

Status: preview. The tool surface is stable enough to build against. The hosted API behind ANCHOR_API_KEY is not open yet — until it is, every answer comes from the sample project.


Development

npm install
npm run build
npm run inspect

npm run inspect opens the MCP Inspector against your local build, which is the fastest way to see a tool's real output while changing it.

src/
  index.ts    server + tool registration
  tools.ts    tool bodies, callable without a transport
  brain.ts    the sample project
  cite.ts     citation formatting

One rule worth knowing before you add a tool: every response goes through answer() in cite.ts, and its cites argument is a non-empty tuple. An uncited answer is a type error rather than a matter of discipline — which is the only way a rule like that survives a deadline.

Logging goes to stderr, never stdout. stdout is the JSON-RPC transport, and one stray console.log on it corrupts the stream and takes the session with it.


License

MIT — see LICENSE.

Available Tools

6 tools
ask_brainAsk the Project BrainA

Ask a question about the product's own history — decisions, constraints, what customers said — and get the fragments that bear on it, each with the source it came from. Returns 'nothing answers that' rather than guessing when the brain has not read it.

Inputs: question (required), limit.

draftDraft from sourcesA

Draft a PRD section, user stories or acceptance criteria for a topic, with every line traced to the fragment behind it and the open questions listed underneath. Refuses to draft when no source supports the topic.

Inputs: kind (required), topic (required).

get_fragmentGet a source fragmentA

Fetch one fragment by id with its full text and where it sits in its source. Every other tool cites fragment ids; this is how you open one.

Inputs: id (required).

list_contradictionsList contradictionsA

Statements in the project's sources that cannot both be true, with both sides quoted and the question somebody has to answer to resolve each one. This is usually the highest-value call: contradictions are what a person cannot hold in their head across six tools.

Inputs: no named parameters.

list_gapsList open questionsA

Questions no source answers, with the role that can answer each and what it blocks. Deliberately returns no citations — there is nothing to cite, which is the point.

Inputs: no named parameters.

list_sourcesList sourcesA

Everything the brain has read for this project — interviews, PRDs, tickets, threads, docs — with how many fragments came out of each. Use it to see what an answer could possibly be based on before you trust one.

Inputs: no named parameters.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: fetching a fragment, drafting content, querying the brain, listing contradictions, listing gaps, and listing sources. There is no functional overlap, so an agent can reliably choose the right tool based on the task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The list_* tools are consistent, but get_fragment, draft, and ask_brain deviate from a uniform verb_noun pattern. Despite this, all names are lowercase with underscores and the verbs are descriptive, making the set readable and predictable overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    With six tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of analyzing and synthesizing project sources. Each tool earns its place, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main workflows: inspecting sources, retrieving fragments, querying historical context, surfacing contradictions and gaps, and drafting. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list all fragments or ingest new sources, but the server appears intentionally read-only, so this is an acceptable limitation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to search, read, and contribute to a structured markdown knowledge base with citations, freshness tracking, and a safe write path, providing a shared, auditable company memory.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that builds a semantic graph memory from a project directory, indexing documentation and code into graph structures and exposing 70+ MCP tools for search, knowledge management, task management, and more.
      4 npm
      15
      Elastic 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates with chat tools to provide context from local projects, enabling reviewed and cited prompts.
      7
      MIT