Skip to main content
Glama
amirhosseinkz

Plane Workflow MCP

by amirhosseinkz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Plane Workflow MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • claude-plane

      FishyF1sh
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server and automation watcher for Plane project management, enabling Claude to interact with Plane via 40+ tools and auto-trigger on labeled issues.
      -

    • Plane MCP

      Rockysingh116
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to fully manage a Plane workspace, including projects, work items, states, labels, cycles, modules, comments, and members.
      38
      MIT

    • plane-mcp

      babazulu
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Plane, the open-source project management tool, exposing a focused set of task and comment management tools for a single Plane project. Includes a setup wizard to bind a local folder to a Plane project and configure Claude Code or Codex.
      16
      3
      MIT

    • plane-ce-mcp

      Bl4nk44
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Unofficial MCP server for self-hosted Plane Community Edition, enabling project management tasks like managing work items, cycles, modules, and initiatives via natural language.
      100
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The core workflow actions (create/start/complete/cancel/update work items) and the git-backfill, reporting, relation, evidence, and attachment tools are clearly distinct. Several read-only status/context tools overlap around workspace, project, profile, setup, and diagnostic information, so an agent may need to inspect descriptions carefully to choose the right getter.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case with a verb-first pattern such as get_, list_, create_, apply_, validate_, and add_. The few longer names remain predictable and readable, with no significant mixing of naming conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 33 tools, the set is heavy for a single MCP server even though the domain is broad. Many setup/status/profile helpers could likely be consolidated or grouped, making discovery and selection more burdensome than necessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers workspace/project activation, workflow profiles, standardization planning, work-item lifecycle operations, relations, evidence links, attachments, reporting, auditing, and git backfill. Minor gaps remain around deletion/detachment operations and standalone comment management, but core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources