wallet_get_holdings
Retrieve all token holdings for a specified wallet address on Solana.
Instructions
Fetch wallet holdings via Dritan.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| wallet | Yes |
Retrieve all token holdings for a specified wallet address on Solana.
Fetch wallet holdings via Dritan.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| wallet | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention read-only nature, authentication needs, or return behavior, leaving the agent uninformed about side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but lacks structure. No front-loading of critical info; could be reorganized for clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and many siblings, description fails to specify what the return value represents (e.g., list of tokens, balances). Agent cannot form accurate expectations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and description adds no meaning for the 'wallet' parameter beyond its name. Agent cannot infer expected format (e.g., address vs name).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description includes verb 'Fetch' and resource 'wallet holdings', but lacks specificity to distinguish from siblings like wallet_get_holdings_page. The phrase 'via Dritan' does not clarify purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as wallet_get_holdings_page or wallet_get_holdings_chart. Agent receives no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/amirdauti/dritan-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server