search_chamber_bodies

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations available. The description does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication needs, rate limits, result format, or whether search is full-text or exact. Limited transparency for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it omits critical details. While it is not verbose, the conciseness comes at the cost of completeness, making it merely adequate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (two parameters, no output schema), the description is insufficient. It does not explain query semantics, limit behavior, pagination, or what the response contains. Contextual gaps leave the agent with many unknowns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (no parameter descriptions). The description mentions the resource types but provides no meaning for the 'query' or 'limit' parameters, leaving the agent without guidance on how to use them effectively.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it searches 'official Chamber committees, delegations, bodies, memberships, and roles.' This verb+resource combination distinguishes it from sibling tools like search_datasets or search_legislation, though 'Chamber' is ambiguous (likely legislative chamber).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Siblings include many search tools, but the description gives no context for choosing this one, no exclusions, and no prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.