mute_toggle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a mutating, non-idempotent action, and the description adds the concrete on/off toggle semantics. It does not dwell on the dependence on the current mute state, but 'toggle' sufficiently conveys that behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence with no filler. It immediately states the action and the object, which is ideal for such a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter command with no output schema and clear annotations, the description covers the core behavior adequately. However, it omits any reference to the sibling mute_on/mute_off tools, which are needed to fully contextualize this command.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to document. The baseline for zero parameters is appropriate here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('toggle') and a clear resource ('le mute du Denon'), and clarifies the on/off behavior. It is more specific than the bare name, but it does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling tools mute_on and mute_off.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus mute_on or mute_off, and no mention of prerequisites or context. The intended use is only implied by the word 'toggle'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.