No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 12 tools
Tools mostly map to distinct steps in a linear interview spine, but there is a potential confusion between the simulated text path (run_interview) and the real phone path (place_call + fetch_transcript), and between the fallback writer (generate_piece) and the preferred writer flow (draft_piece + check_citations). Fortunately, the descriptions explicitly clarify these boundaries, which mitigates the overlap.
The names are mostly snake_case verb_noun (e.g., approve_contact, run_interview, fetch_transcript, check_citations). A few names are nouns or noun phrases (brief, question_templates, status), which is a minor deviation but still readable and consistent with the domain.
With 12 tools, the count is not unreasonable, but three stubs (question_templates, download_recording, discover_contacts) are explicitly cut-list placeholders that add no real functionality and dilute the set. The remaining tools feel appropriately scoped for the interview workflow.
The surface covers the full spine from brief to approval to interview to piece generation and citation checking, with status reporting. However, the stubs represent unimplemented features, and there is no tool to update or delete briefs or transcripts, though the workflow may not require them.
