Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Jev Decision MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Turn your typed TypeScript functions into an MCP server — tool, resource, and prompt schemas inferred from your types and JSDoc. No schema library, no decorators, no boilerplate.
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A TypeScript-based MCP server that provides tools to interact with local Codex and Gemini CLIs via stdio transport. It enables users to execute prompts through the ask_codex and ask_gemini tools, supporting custom models and timeout configurations.
      1
      3 npm
      6
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A production-ready TypeScript MCP server providing basic tools (add, echo, timestamp), resources (server info, greetings, data access), and prompt templates (analyze, code-review, summarize). Serves as a foundation for building custom MCP servers with extensible architecture.
      221 npm
      -

    TDQS

    A4.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's internal modes (choice, score, noul) are clearly delineated within the description, so an agent can unambiguously select this tool for any decision-related task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'jev_decide' follows a clear prefix-verb pattern (server name + action). Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency to evaluate; the naming is predictable and matches the server's purpose.

    Tool Count4/5

    One tool is slightly thin by general guidelines, but this server is highly specialized for decision-making. The tool consolidates multiple decision types into a single callable interface, making a larger tool count unnecessary. The count is reasonable for the narrow scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool comprehensively covers the decision-making domain: choice selection, scoring on ordered levels, and probability of a yes outcome. It also provides confidence metrics, token usage, and handles batching of independent questions. There are no obvious missing operations for a decision-support tool, as it explicitly does not execute actions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues