Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bugcap

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A local MCP server that captures screenshots and narrated screen recordings, then turns visual feedback into Markdown reports with screenshots and timestamps. Its nine tools cover screen capture, video analysis, screen descriptions, and exporting findings to GitHub or Linear; desktop capture targets macOS and Windows.
    19 npm
    80
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that watches for screen recordings, transcribes spoken feedback locally, and attaches each comment to the relevant frame, enabling coding agents to see and fix the issues you mention.
    5
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A local-first MCP server that gives AI coding agents runtime visibility and AI-managed debug logging. It replaces blind print() debugging by turning runtime execution into causal chains, allowing agents to instantly locate bugs by finding missing .success events in Python and TypeScript code. Single binary with MCP, CLI, and HTTP interfaces.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A local-first MCP server that lets coding agents record what they learn as provenance-carrying observations, retrieve and traverse that shared project memory, and keep contradictory claims side by side for human mediation. It enables opt-in peer sync of a workspace across machines, with every assertion keeping its source, basis, and computed trust tier.
    Apache 2.0

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource+action: listing vs reading reports, importing issues, requesting a screenshot, attaching images vs files, and updating notes. The only potentially confusable pair (attach_image/attach_file) is explicitly cross-referenced in both descriptions, and request_screenshot is clearly differentiated by requiring human action.

Naming Consistency5/5

All seven tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_reports, get_report, request_screenshot, pull_issues, attach_image, attach_file, update_notes. No deviations in style or casing.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well-scoped for a bug-report capture server, and each tool earns its place in a distinct workflow step (browse, read, import, capture, attach, annotate). No redundant or filler tools.

Completeness3/5

Core read/import/attach/annotate flow is covered, but status and tags are surfaced in list/get yet no tool can set them, and there is no delete/remove-media operation nor an explicit create_report (only implicitly via request_screenshot). These triage gaps are notable dead ends for a bug-tracking domain.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive