bugcap
Related Servers
Alternatives to bugcap
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceFeedback ingestion for AI agents. Record your screen and talk; your agent does the rest — files the bugs, writes the spec, builds the backlog.9442 PyPI32MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server that captures screenshots and narrated screen recordings, then turns visual feedback into Markdown reports with screenshots and timestamps. Its nine tools cover screen capture, video analysis, screen descriptions, and exporting findings to GitHub or Linear; desktop capture targets macOS and Windows.19 npm80MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that watches for screen recordings, transcribes spoken feedback locally, and attaches each comment to the relevant frame, enabling coding agents to see and fix the issues you mention.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first memory layer for AI coding agents — Markdown as source of truth, MCP server + CLI, human-reviewed capture, team knowledge via git PRs611462 npm6Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that gives AI coding agents runtime visibility and AI-managed debug logging. It replaces blind print() debugging by turning runtime execution into causal chains, allowing agents to instantly locate bugs by finding missing .success events in Python and TypeScript code. Single binary with MCP, CLI, and HTTP interfaces.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted issue tracker built for agent-driven development. One binary, SQLite storage, MCP-native, with a web UI, REST API, and CLI for the humans.2777Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that lets coding agents record what they learn as provenance-carrying observations, retrieve and traverse that shared project memory, and keep contradictory claims side by side for human mediation. It enables opt-in peer sync of a workspace across machines, with every assertion keeping its source, basis, and computed trust tier.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource+action: listing vs reading reports, importing issues, requesting a screenshot, attaching images vs files, and updating notes. The only potentially confusable pair (attach_image/attach_file) is explicitly cross-referenced in both descriptions, and request_screenshot is clearly differentiated by requiring human action.
All seven tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_reports, get_report, request_screenshot, pull_issues, attach_image, attach_file, update_notes. No deviations in style or casing.
Seven tools is well-scoped for a bug-report capture server, and each tool earns its place in a distinct workflow step (browse, read, import, capture, attach, annotate). No redundant or filler tools.
Core read/import/attach/annotate flow is covered, but status and tags are surfaced in list/get yet no tool can set them, and there is no delete/remove-media operation nor an explicit create_report (only implicitly via request_screenshot). These triage gaps are notable dead ends for a bug-tracking domain.