Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Agents

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A FastMCP server exposing 22 tools for calendar, to-do, notes, web search, math, scratchpad, task queue, and sandboxed code execution, designed for safe RL training with structured outputs and FastMCP transforms.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A personal AI assistant server that provides MCP tools for notes, files, reminders, memory, shell, browser, and 30+ SaaS integrations, enabling AI clients to access and manage your data across sessions.
      3,965
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing arithmetic tools, dynamic file resources for frontend/backend documentation, reusable prompt templates for code review/debugging/testing, and complete development workflow management from requirements to deployment.
      4
      33 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing 21+ tools for mathematical operations, string manipulation, file handling, utilities, and web requests via FastAPI and WebSocket.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: three tools retrieve information about specific agents (Development, Product Owner, Quality Assurance), while the fourth lists all agents. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'get_dev_agent', 'get_po_agent', 'get_qa_agent', and 'list_all_agents'. The verbs 'get' and 'list' are appropriately used and maintain a predictable naming convention throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for managing agent information, though it might feel slightly thin if more operations (e.g., create, update, delete agents) were expected. However, for a read-only information retrieval server, it is well-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers read operations (get and list) for agents, which is appropriate for an information retrieval purpose. However, there are notable gaps if the domain implies management capabilities, such as creating, updating, or deleting agents, which are missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues