Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
cpg_queryC

CPG & AST radar: def-use chains, CFG, virtual interfaces, blast radius.

rlm_executeC

Sandboxed RLM REPL executor with transactional CoW rollback, 3-phase EGRI linter, governor.

memory_evolveC

Semantic memory: AGM revision, GC, distill_global, query_global, search, persist.

swarm_blackboardD

Swarm blackboard & OCC concurrency: Kung-Robinson OCC validation, Tree-CRDT 3-way merge, Linda tuple space.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

C2.6/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a completely different subsystem: static code analysis, sandboxed execution, semantic memory, and concurrency/blackboard coordination. There is no overlap or plausible confusion between them.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools follow a readable two-part snake_case format with domain-specific prefixes. However, the suffixes mix verbs (query, execute, evolve) with a noun (blackboard), creating a minor deviation from a fully uniform pattern.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is a reasonable, focused count for a server whose scope appears to be a coordinated agent runtime: analyze, execute, remember, and coordinate. Each tool earns its place and none feel redundant.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the major capabilities one would expect from this kind of system: code understanding, safe execution, memory persistence, and shared-state coordination. There are minor gaps such as explicit file/API interaction, but the broad sub-operations embedded in each tool make the overall surface feel fairly complete.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues