saas_alerts_events_query

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that the result is a paginated list and that filters are optional, which is useful but not rich—it doesn't mention behavior like default limit, sorting, or error conditions. Since annotations carry the main burden, a score of 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences with no filler. It front-loads the purpose and immediately states the return type. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 9 parameters, no output schema, and several closely related sibling tools (query_advanced, count, scroll). The description mentions pagination and filters but does not explain the return structure or differentiate from siblings. It is adequate but incomplete for a tool with this complexity and context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are already documented in the input schema. The description does not add extra meaning beyond the generic 'optional filters' and 'paginated list', which doesn't elaborate on specific parameter semantics. Baseline 3 is correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Query') and resource ('security events from SaaS Alerts'), which makes the purpose obvious. However, it does not distinguish this tool from sibling tools like `saas_alerts_events_query_advanced` or `saas_alerts_events_scroll`, so it misses the top score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as the advanced query, count, or scroll tools. It only says 'with optional filters' and 'paginated list', which implies usage for listing events but does not exclude or explain when a different tool would be preferable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.