Get device audit by MAC address

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description does not explain what 'audit data' includes, whether it returns a single item or list, or any side effects. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but only gives format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence plus format note; no wasted words. Could be slightly more structured but is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and description does not clarify return value structure, error handling, or pagination. For a simple tool, it omits expected output details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter. Description adds format rule and example, reinforcing the schema's pattern. Adds minimal extra meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action ('Get audit data') and resource ('device(s) matching a MAC address'). Distinguishes from sibling tools like datto_get_device_audit and datto_get_device_by_mac by combining both 'audit' and 'by mac'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like datto_get_device_audit or datto_get_device_by_mac. Only provides format constraint, not context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.