Skip to main content
Glama
alxark

data-filter-mcp

by alxark
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to data-filter-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-json-reader

      oovz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading, querying, and filtering local JSON files with extended JSONPath syntax, supporting sorting, aggregations, and complex conditions.
      356 npm
      2
      MIT

    • paddock

      JohnXu22786
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local filesystem MCP server providing constrained file operations (read/write, directory management, search, metadata) within configurable directories, with read-only mode and zero runtime dependencies.
      2 npm
      MIT

    • jq-mcp

      kolodny
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a single tool, jq, for running jq filters against JSON files on disk.
      1
      13 npm
      MIT

    • Kitbag MCP

      syedtaj7
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An open-source MCP server bundling 50+ local utility tools for PDF processing, web scraping, OCR, data transformation, and more, with zero configuration and no API keys required.
      51
      102 npm
      MIT

    • Modular MCP Server

      0brym
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A config-driven, zero-dependency MCP server with plugin architecture that enables filesystem operations, shell commands, HTTP requests, and utilities through simple JSON configuration.
      3
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    register_filter clearly creates and validates a new filter, while run_filter and convert_file both execute an existing filter. Their output behaviors (return text vs write a file) are well described, but the shared execution step creates some potential for confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: register_filter, run_filter, convert_file. The naming is predictable and easy to scan.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools cover the minimal register/run/persist workflow for a custom filter service. The set is tightly scoped, and no tool feels redundant or out of place.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle operations are present: register a filter, execute it read-only, and execute it with file persistence. Missing list/delete/get-filter operations are minor gaps, partly mitigated by server-side TTL, but an agent cannot explicitly inspect or revoke filters.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources