de en es ja ko ru zh

sellercloud-mcp

Name: sellercloud-mcp
Author: alveyautomation

by alveyautomation

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

Python

Remote

sellercloud-mcp

El primer servidor del Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) para SellerCloud. Conecta Claude a tu catálogo, inventario, pedidos y listados de canales: solo lectura, en cinco minutos.

License: MIT Python 3.10+ MCP

Por qué existe esto

SellerCloud no tiene un SDK público. Su API REST está bien documentada pero no tiene marca: cada equipo que automatiza procesos con ella termina escribiendo desde cero el mismo código de autenticación y paginación.

Si utilizas Claude (o cualquier asistente de IA compatible con MCP) para gestionar el comercio electrónico en el día a día, esa brecha es la diferencia entre que "resumir los pedidos de hoy" funcione de inmediato y que requiera una integración personalizada.

sellercloud-mcp cierra esa brecha. Es un servidor MCP pequeño, bien probado y con licencia MIT que expone siete endpoints de SellerCloud de solo lectura a cualquier cliente MCP. Construido a partir de años de experiencia ejecutando automatización de comercio electrónico a gran escala.

Related MCP server: keycrm-mcp

Qué puedes hacer con él

Conecta este servidor a Claude Code, Claude Desktop o cualquier host MCP, y luego pregunta cosas como:

"Busca cualquier SKU que contenga WIDGET y muéstrame los niveles de inventario."
"¿Cuántos pedidos enviamos ayer en todos los mercados? Agrúpalos por canal."
"Obtén el pedido 100001 y dime qué artículos se enviaron."
"Enumera los canales configurados para la empresa 9001 y muestra cuáles están activos."
"Para el SKU ACME-001, compara el precio en todos los listados de canales."

Claude lee tu catálogo directamente. Sin copiar y pegar, sin hojas de cálculo, sin tuberías personalizadas.

Herramientas (v0.1, todas de solo lectura)

Herramienta	Qué hace
`sellercloud_search_products`	Búsqueda de texto libre en el catálogo (nombre, SKU, atributos).
`sellercloud_get_product`	Obtiene un producto por SKU exacto.
`sellercloud_search_orders`	Lista pedidos en un rango de fechas, opcionalmente por empresa.
`sellercloud_get_order`	Obtiene un pedido por ID, incluyendo artículos.
`sellercloud_get_inventory`	Cantidad actual disponible / reservada / en pedido para un SKU.
`sellercloud_list_channels`	Lista los feeds de mercado/canal configurados.
`sellercloud_get_channel_listing`	Detalle de listado por canal para un SKU.

Los endpoints de escritura (crear pedido, actualizar inventario, enviar cambios de canal) intencionalmente no están en la v0.1. Están planificados para la v0.2 una vez que la ergonomía de solo lectura se estabilice.

Instalación

pip install sellercloud-mcp

La v0.1 se distribuye desde este repositorio. La publicación en PyPI está pendiente; por ahora, instálalo con pip install git+https://github.com/alveyautomation/sellercloud-mcp o clónalo y ejecuta pip install -e . localmente.

Configurar credenciales

El servidor lee todo desde variables de entorno. Copia .env.example a .env y completa tu tenant:

SELLERCLOUD_API_URL=https://your-team.api.sellercloud.com/rest/
SELLERCLOUD_USERNAME=your-username
SELLERCLOUD_PASSWORD=your-password
SELLERCLOUD_DEFAULT_COMPANY_ID=        # optional fallback
SELLERCLOUD_HTTP_TIMEOUT=60            # optional, seconds
SELLERCLOUD_MAX_RETRIES=3              # optional

Usa una cuenta de SellerCloud de solo lectura. La v0.1 solo llama a endpoints GET, pero la defensa en profundidad significa que debes proporcionar al servidor un usuario dedicado que no pueda modificar nada. Cuando llegue la v0.2 con herramientas de escritura, opta por actualizar la credencial, nunca al revés.

Conectar a Claude Code

Añade a ~/.claude/claude_code_config.json (o a la configuración MCP de tu proyecto):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sellercloud": {
      "command": "sellercloud-mcp",
      "env": {
        "SELLERCLOUD_API_URL": "https://your-team.api.sellercloud.com/rest/",
        "SELLERCLOUD_USERNAME": "your-username",
        "SELLERCLOUD_PASSWORD": "your-password",
        "SELLERCLOUD_DEFAULT_COMPANY_ID": "9001"
      }
    }
  }
}

Reinicia Claude Code. Las siete herramientas sellercloud_* aparecerán en cualquier sesión nueva.

Conectar a Claude Desktop

Edita ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS) o %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows) y añade el mismo bloque mcpServers de arriba. Reinicia la aplicación de escritorio.

Referencia de herramientas

Cada herramienta devuelve un sobre JSON:

{ "ok": true,  "data": { ... } }
{ "ok": false, "error": "human-readable message" }

`sellercloud_search_products`

sellercloud_search_products(
    query: str,                          # required
    company_id: int | None = None,       # falls back to default if unset
    page: int = 1,
    page_size: int = 50,                 # capped at 50 by SellerCloud
)

Respuesta de ejemplo:

{
  "ok": true,
  "data": {
    "items": [
      { "ID": "ACME-WIDGET-001", "ProductName": "Acme Widget, Standard", "Price": 29.99 }
    ],
    "total": 1,
    "page": 1,
    "page_size": 50
  }
}

`sellercloud_get_product`

sellercloud_get_product(sku: str, company_id: int | None = None)

Devuelve el registro del catálogo, o data: null si el SKU no está en el catálogo de la empresa.

`sellercloud_search_orders`

sellercloud_search_orders(
    date_from: str,                      # ISO date "YYYY-MM-DD"
    date_to: str,                        # ISO date "YYYY-MM-DD"
    company_id: int | None = None,
    query: str | None = None,
    limit: int = 200,                    # max 1000
)

Paginación manejada de forma transparente: SellerCloud limita el tamaño de página a 50, pero la herramienta recopila páginas hasta el limit. La respuesta incluye limit_reached: true cuando hubo más pedidos de los permitidos por limit.

`sellercloud_get_order`

sellercloud_get_order(order_id: int)

Devuelve el registro completo del pedido (con Items[]), o data: null para un 404.

`sellercloud_get_inventory`

sellercloud_get_inventory(sku: str, company_id: int | None = None)

El registro devuelto incluye:

InventoryAvailableQty: lo que la API considera vendible en este momento
PhysicalQty: cantidad disponible físicamente
ReservedQty: reservada para pedidos abiertos
OnOrder: cantidad entrante en órdenes de compra

Usa InventoryAvailableQty como el número canónico de "cantidad que puedo vender".

`sellercloud_list_channels`

sellercloud_list_channels(company_id: int | None = None)

Devuelve la lista de feeds de canales configurados para la empresa. Cada registro incluye ChannelID, Name y Active.

`sellercloud_get_channel_listing`

sellercloud_get_channel_listing(channel_id: int, sku: str)

Detalle de listado por canal. Útil para verificar precios en diferentes mercados.

Desarrollo local

git clone https://github.com/alveyautomation/sellercloud-mcp
cd sellercloud-mcp
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate    # Windows: .venv\Scripts\activate
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest                                                # 44 tests, ~4s

Hooks de pre-commit (gitleaks, ruff, formateador, limpiador de huellas de tenant):

pip install pre-commit
pre-commit install

Las pruebas de integración contra una cuenta sandbox real de SellerCloud están protegidas detrás de SELLERCLOUD_INTEGRATION_TESTS=1. No son necesarias para una contribución normal.

Solución de problemas

Failed to obtain SellerCloud token: nombre de usuario/contraseña rechazados. Causa más común: la cuenta tiene 2FA habilitado o está bloqueada. El endpoint POST /api/token de SellerCloud espera una cuenta de servicio sin 2FA.

Missing required environment variables: el servidor intentó iniciarse antes de que se cargara su .env. Exporta las variables en el shell principal o asegúrate de que la configuración de tu host MCP las incluya en el bloque env.

Resultados vacíos a pesar de datos conocidos: confirma que el company_id es correcto. SellerCloud devuelve solo la empresa predeterminada del usuario autenticado a menos que pases companyID explícitamente.

La paginación se siente lenta: el tamaño de página está limitado a 50 por SellerCloud, no por nosotros. Para rangos de fechas grandes, espera múltiples viajes de ida y vuelta.

Contribución

Las incidencias y solicitudes de extracción (pull requests) son bienvenidas. Por favor:

Ejecuta pytest antes de abrir un PR (pip install -e ".[dev]").
Ejecuta pre-commit run --all-files.
Mantén las adiciones al alcance de la v0.1 solo de lectura. Los endpoints de escritura llegarán en la v0.2.
Solo datos sintéticos en las pruebas: nada de SKUs reales, nombres de clientes o números de pedido.

Licencia

MIT: consulta LICENSE.

Descargo de responsabilidad

sellercloud-mcp es una integración de terceros no oficial. No está respaldada, afiliada ni apoyada por SellerCloud, Inc. "SellerCloud" es una marca comercial de SellerCloud, Inc. Úsalo bajo tu propio riesgo; verifica el comportamiento con tu tenant antes de depender de él para decisiones de producción.

Available Tools

7 tools

sellercloud_get_channel_listingA

Fetch the per-channel listing record for a single SKU.

Args: channel_id: SellerCloud ChannelID (integer). sku: Exact SKU.

Returns: JSON envelope. data is the listing record, or null if the SKU is not listed on the given channel.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`channel_id`	Yes
`sku`	Yes

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, the description discloses the return format (JSON envelope with data field) and the null case when SKU is not listed. This provides adequate transparency for a read-only operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using three sentences to convey purpose, parameters, and return value. Every sentence is meaningful and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists, the description sufficiently covers the tool's functionality, input requirements, and output behavior (including null). It is complete for the task of selecting and invoking the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden. It reiterates the types (integer, exact SKU) which matches the schema, but does not add additional meaning or constraints beyond what is obvious from names and types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it fetches the per-channel listing record for a single SKU, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like sellercloud_get_inventory or sellercloud_get_product by focusing on channel listings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving a listing by channel and SKU, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternative tools. No guidance on prerequisites or context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sellercloud_get_inventoryA

Fetch the current inventory record for a single SKU.

Args: sku: Exact SKU / InventoryID. company_id: CompanyID scoping the lookup.

Returns: JSON envelope. data is the inventory record (with on-hand, reserved, on-order, available qty fields), or null if absent.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`sku`	Yes
`company_id`	No

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It states 'Fetch,' implying a read-only operation, and describes the return format including null for absent records. It does not mention authorization or side effects, but the context suggests a safe read.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise with no wasted words. It front-loads the core action in the first sentence, then efficiently lists parameters and return values in a structured format.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with two parameters and an output schema (though not explicitly shown), the description fully explains the purpose, parameters, and return value. It covers edge cases (null if absent) and key fields in the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% meaning no descriptions in the schema. The description adds meaning: 'sku' is described as 'Exact SKU / InventoryID' and 'company_id' as 'CompanyID scoping the lookup,' which clarifies their roles beyond the type-only schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it fetches inventory for a single SKU, using a specific verb ('Fetch') and resource ('inventory record'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like sellercloud_get_order or sellercloud_get_product, which target different entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description specifies it's for a single SKU and lists required parameters. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide exclusion criteria. The purpose is clear enough for an agent to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sellercloud_get_orderA

Fetch full order detail including line items.

Args: order_id: SellerCloud OrderID (integer).

Returns: JSON envelope. data is the order record, or null if the order does not exist.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`order_id`	Yes

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It discloses that it returns null if order not found, but does not mention authentication requirements, rate limits, or any side effects. Minimal behavioral info.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: four lines total. Front-loaded with purpose, then structured parameter and return descriptions. No redundant sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with 1 parameter and an output schema, the description covers the core functionality, parameter meaning, and return behavior. Missing usage guidance and behavioral details (rate limits, auth) but acceptable given low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (no param descriptions in schema). Description adds 'SellerCloud OrderID (integer)', which gives context beyond the schema's 'Order Id' title and integer type. However, it does not elaborate on format or possible values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Fetch full order detail including line items.' Identifies specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from siblings like sellercloud_search_orders (search vs fetch) and sellercloud_get_product (different resource).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives. Usage is implied by requiring an order_id, but no guidance on context (e.g., use when you have an ID, vs search_orders when you don't).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sellercloud_get_productA

Fetch the full catalog record for a single SKU.

Args: sku: Exact SKU / ProductID to look up. company_id: CompanyID scoping the lookup.

Returns: JSON envelope. data is the product record, or null when the SKU is not present in the company's catalog.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`sku`	Yes
`company_id`	No

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the return format as a JSON envelope and the possibility of null for missing SKU, but lacks details on idempotency, side effects, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a structured Args and Returns section, front-loaded with the main purpose, and no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity and the presence of an output schema, the description adequately covers purpose, parameters, and return shape. However, it could mention the absence of pagination or limits on the record size.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, so the description compensates by clarifying 'sku' as 'Exact SKU / ProductID' and 'company_id' as 'CompanyID scoping the lookup', adding meaning beyond the raw types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Fetch' and specifies the resource as 'full catalog record for a single SKU', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'sellercloud_search_products' which implies search functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states 'for a single SKU', implying use when exact SKU is known. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use or compare with alternatives like 'sellercloud_get_channel_listing'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sellercloud_list_channelsA

List configured channel feeds for the given company.

Args: company_id: CompanyID scoping the lookup.

Returns: JSON envelope. data.channels is the list of channel records.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`company_id`	No

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes return structure as 'JSON envelope with data.channels'. Given no annotations, it adds some context (scoping lookup by company_id) but lacks details on side effects, rate limits, or behavior with null company_id.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences in a clean Args/Returns format. No superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list operation, the description covers purpose, parameter role, and return structure. Lacks only minor details like read-only hint or error cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only parameter 'company_id' is explained as 'CompanyID scoping the lookup'. Adds meaningful context beyond the schema title, compensating for 0% schema description coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'List configured channel feeds for the given company'. Verb (List) and resource (channel feeds) are specific. Differentiates from sibling 'sellercloud_get_channel_listing' by being a list operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of when not to use or when to prefer a sibling like 'sellercloud_get_channel_listing'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sellercloud_search_ordersA

Search orders created in the inclusive [date_from, date_to] window.

Args: date_from: ISO date (YYYY-MM-DD), start of window. date_to: ISO date (YYYY-MM-DD), end of window. company_id: CompanyID to scope the search to. If omitted, returns orders for the authenticated user's default company. query: Optional free-text filter applied server-side. limit: Cap on yielded orders (default 200, max 1000). The underlying API caps page size at 50; pagination is handled transparently.

Returns: JSON envelope. data.orders is the list of order records.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`date_from`	Yes
`date_to`	Yes
`company_id`	No
`query`	No
`limit`	No

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description adequately discloses behavioral traits: pagination is handled transparently, limit caps (default 200, max 1000), default company behavior for company_id. This goes beyond basic parameter names.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a brief purpose, clear args list, and returns section. It is slightly verbose but every sentence adds value. No superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters and an output schema, the description covers date range, optional filters, pagination, limit, and return envelope. It could mention error handling or rate limits, but overall it is sufficiently complete for effective tool use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must fully explain parameters. It does: date_from/date_to with ISO format, company_id with default behavior, query as free-text filter, limit with default and max. This adds significant meaning beyond the schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Search orders created in the inclusive [date_from, date_to] window.' This specifies the verb (search), resource (orders), and scope (date range), distinguishing it from sibling tools like sellercloud_get_order (single order) and sellercloud_search_products (product search).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for browsing orders within a date window but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like sellercloud_get_order or sellercloud_search_products. No when-not guidance or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sellercloud_search_productsA

Search the SellerCloud catalog by name, SKU, or attribute.

Args: query: Free-text search string. Matches against product name, SKU, and indexed attributes. company_id: SellerCloud CompanyID to scope the search to. Falls back to SELLERCLOUD_DEFAULT_COMPANY_ID if omitted. page: 1-indexed page number. page_size: Page size (max 50 enforced server-side).

Returns: JSON envelope: {"ok": true, "data": {"items": [...], "total": N}}.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`query`	Yes
`company_id`	No
`page`	No
`page_size`	No

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It reveals behavioral details like page_size max 50 enforced server-side, pagination behavior, and the response envelope. It does not mention authentication, rate limits, or case sensitivity, but for a search tool the provided info is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured using bullet points for parameters and a clear Returns section. It is concise but could be slightly more compact (e.g., removing the docstring formatting overhead). Still, every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, no annotations, and an output schema (though not provided), the description covers parameter semantics, pagination, and return format. It lacks cross-referencing to siblings or mention of authorization, but overall it is complete for a search operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, so the description must compensate. It does so excellently by explaining that query is free-text, company_id has a fallback default, page is 1-indexed, and page_size is capped at 50. This adds substantial meaning beyond the schema's type-only definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Search the SellerCloud catalog by name, SKU, or attribute,' providing a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like sellercloud_get_product (single product retrieval) and sellercloud_search_orders (different entity), making the tool's role unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for general product searching but does not explicitly state when to avoid it or compare it to siblings like sellercloud_get_channel_listing or sellercloud_get_inventory. However, the parameter descriptions give clear context on how to use the tool effectively.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

7 tool updatesv0.1.0Apr 27, 2026
- First observedsellercloud_get_channel_listing
- First observedsellercloud_get_inventory
- First observedsellercloud_get_order
- First observedsellercloud_get_product
- First observedsellercloud_list_channels
- First observedsellercloud_search_orders
- First observedsellercloud_search_products

Deploy Server

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored 2026-04-27 05:10 across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: product, inventory, order, channel listing, channels list, and two searches. No overlap in purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent `sellercloud_verb_noun` pattern (get_, list_, search_), with clear verb choice for the operation type.

Tool Count5/5

7 tools is well-scoped for a seller cloud integration covering core data retrieval: product, inventory, order, and channel information.

Completeness3/5

The tool set is read-only, covering get and search for products, orders, inventory, and channels. Missing update/create operations that agents might need for full workflow support.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive

ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

GitHub Repository

Need Help?

Related Servers

Related MCP Connectors

Agent Central A
to.agentcentral
Hosted Amazon Seller Central and Amazon Ads MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and agents.
Customer Support E-commerce & Retail
9726
DataDoe MCPOAuth
com.datadoe
Hosted Amazon Seller and Vendor MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, Copilot.
E-commerce & Retail CRM
215
Terra Natural Seller MCPOAuth
uk.co.sellermcp
Connect Amazon Seller Central to Claude or ChatGPT via MCP. Orders, inventory, pricing, fees, FBA.
E-commerce & Retail Finance
1
Amazon Seller Central & Ads MCP A
ai.agentxray
Amazon Seller Central and Ads inside Claude or ChatGPT. Real fees from your own settlements.
E-commerce & Retail Finance
281

Related MCP Servers

TripleWhale MCP Serverofficial
E-commerce & Retail Search Databases
Triple-Whale
A
license
Not graded
quality
C
maintenance
An implementation of Model Context Protocol (MCP) that allows users to interact with TripleWhale's e-commerce analytics platform using natural language queries through Claude Desktop.
Updated a year ago (2025-09-30 12:49 UTC)
106 npm
7
MIT
keycrm-mcp
CRM E-commerce & Retail
IvanKlymenko
F
license
Not graded
quality
C
maintenance
A Model Context Protocol server that lets Claude manage keyCRM catalogue, stock, orders, customers, pipelines, and more via natural language.
Updated 7 months ago (2026-03-25 11:17 UTC)
3
-
Amazon Seller MCP Server -
E-commerce & Retail Finance Marketing
Deltologic
A
license
Not graded
quality
B
maintenance
Hosted Amazon Seller Central & Vendor Central MCP server. Connect Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, and GitHub Copilot to live Amazon SP-API and Amazon Ads API data.
Updated 8 days ago (2026-10-06 10:39 UTC)
15
MIT
MCP4Acumatica
ERP Systems Finance CRM
NologyAcu
A
license
Not graded
quality
C
maintenance
A Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude to Acumatica ERP, enabling AI-driven data access with per-user OAuth, role-based permissions, and automatic sensitive field redaction.
Updated 2 months ago (2026-08-21 13:15 UTC)
Apache 2.0

sellercloud-mcp

Por qué existe esto

Qué puedes hacer con él

Herramientas (v0.1, todas de solo lectura)

Instalación

Configurar credenciales

Conectar a Claude Code

Conectar a Claude Desktop

Referencia de herramientas

sellercloud_search_products

sellercloud_get_product

sellercloud_search_orders

sellercloud_get_order

sellercloud_get_inventory

sellercloud_list_channels

sellercloud_get_channel_listing

Desarrollo local

Solución de problemas

Contribución

Licencia

Descargo de responsabilidad

Available Tools

Output Schema

Output Schema

Output Schema

Output Schema

Output Schema

Output Schema

Output Schema

Tool Schema Changelog

Maintenance

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

TripleWhale MCP Serverofficial

`sellercloud_search_products`

`sellercloud_get_product`

`sellercloud_search_orders`

`sellercloud_get_order`

`sellercloud_get_inventory`

`sellercloud_list_channels`

`sellercloud_get_channel_listing`