turn_up_volume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full weight. It does not disclose potential side effects (e.g., volume clamping at 0/100), permission requirements, or whether the action is immediate. This lack of detail is a gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured with a clear title, args, and returns section. Every sentence is necessary and no extraneous information is present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter, and the description covers basic use. However, it lacks details on behavior at extremes, feedback, or integration with system settings. The output is vaguely described as 'success or error message', lacking specifics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema only provides type, default, min, and max. The description adds meaningful context: the 0-100 scale and default increment of 6.25%. This goes beyond the schema, aiding proper parameter selection.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Turn up system volume' with a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating the action. It naturally distinguishes from the sibling 'turn_down_volume'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for increasing volume but provides no explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives, such as 'increase_brightness' or when volume might already be at maximum.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.