Skip to main content
Glama
alsoleg89

decide

by alsoleg89
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to decide

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev_triage

      Axiumine
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to cheaply bulk-screen 30 or more short items (repo blurbs, issue titles, log lines, grep hits, test names) against one crisp yes/no criterion, using Jev to sort them into clear_yes, uncertain and clear_no buckets instead of spending its own tokens on each. It supports inline items or a project-local .json/.jsonl file read server-side to keep context cost low, while treating results as advisory only.
      GPL 3.0

    • Jev AI MCP

      weidacn
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connect AI agents to Jev AI (jev-ai.pro) for classification, scoring, yes/no checks, advisory action assessment, batched typed decisions and saved judges. Returns structured answers and probabilities using your Jev AI API key.
      6
      MIT

    • JevMCP

      NicolasRisso
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to offload yes/no, multiple-choice, and scoring questions to TypeSafe's Jev, returning compact confidence-scored answers to save tokens and improve speed.
      1
      MIT

    • Jev Decision Gate

      f-tiger
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables maintainers to batch-triage local Issue JSON, optionally invoke the Jev model, and calibrate plus held-out evaluate a policy that gates which predictions may be auto-accepted versus sent to human review. Also supports task and usage checks with call limits, without editing issues, applying labels, or posting comments.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined in its description, so an agent cannot misselect among alternatives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name 'decide' is a single, simple verb with no conflicting conventions. Since there is only one name, there is no inconsistency to evaluate, and it follows a clear imperative style.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has exactly one tool, which feels thin for a general-purpose utility. However, the tool itself is quite comprehensive, covering multiple input sources and options, so it is not trivial. The count is on the borderline of being too sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The single tool covers the full decision-making workflow including input handling, criteria, thresholds, and review options. Minor gaps exist such as no dedicated retrieval tool for prior results, but the tool returns paths to full results, making the surface reasonably complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources