Skip to main content
Glama
alsoleg89

decide

by alsoleg89
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to decide

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • openrouter-jev-mcp

      ctmx
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to obtain probabilistic decisions from Jev AI via OpenRouter for classification, scoring, and validation, with tools like jev_check, jev_classify, jev_score, and jev_evaluate.
      5
      MIT

    • askjev

      pZacca
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to get fast, calibrated probabilistic answers from Jev (Typesafe AI) to yes/no, scale, or choice questions about provided material, without using a generative model.
      1
      MIT

    • Jev MCP

      chungsubeen0
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined in its description, so an agent cannot misselect among alternatives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name 'decide' is a single, simple verb with no conflicting conventions. Since there is only one name, there is no inconsistency to evaluate, and it follows a clear imperative style.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has exactly one tool, which feels thin for a general-purpose utility. However, the tool itself is quite comprehensive, covering multiple input sources and options, so it is not trivial. The count is on the borderline of being too sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The single tool covers the full decision-making workflow including input handling, criteria, thresholds, and review options. Minor gaps exist such as no dedicated retrieval tool for prior results, but the tool returns paths to full results, making the surface reasonably complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources