A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables collaborative LaTeX editing on Overleaf with tracked changes, review comments, compilation, file management, and downloads via a single MCP connection.
26
1
AGPL 3.0
olcli
by aloth
Related Servers
Alternatives to olcli
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, write, compile, and manage Overleaf projects through MCP, including file operations, project administration, and LaTeX compilation diagnostics.163 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Overleaf projects, enabling project listing, file reads, LaTeX section discovery, and revision-guarded writes through natural language.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to manage Overleaf projects via Git sync, including listing, reading, writing, and syncing files.442 PyPI64MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for managing academic LaTeX projects in Overleaf: create projects, transfer files, compile documents, inspect compiler output, and download PDFs.162 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, upload, compile, and manage projects in a self-hosted Overleaf Community Edition via MCP, while also providing a git remote for cloning and pushing changes.1MIT
This server cannot be deployed
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 21 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct resource+action targets, and rename_project explicitly disambiguates itself from rename_entity. However, the compile trio (compile, download_pdf, compile_with_outputs) all compile and differ mainly in output destination, and get_project_info (file tree) vs get_entities (flat list) vs pull_project (full zip) overlap enough to require reading descriptions carefully.
Naming Consistency4/5
Almost everything follows a snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_projects, push_file, resolve_comment, rename_entity, plan_project_renames). Minor deviations are the bare verb 'compile' and verb-only 'download_pdf', which are still readable and unambiguous.
Tool Count4/5
21 tools is on the heavy side but the domain genuinely spans projects, files, comments, tracked changes, compilation, and bulk rename planning, and each tool maps to a real operation. A few could be consolidated (compile variants), keeping it just under 'well-scoped'.
Completeness3/5
Core lifecycle is covered (list/create/rename projects, pull/push/download/delete/rename files, comment lifecycle, compile, accept/reject tracked changes). But accept_tracked_changes and reject_tracked_changes require change IDs with no corresponding list_tracked_changes tool, and there is no move-entity or comment delete/reopen operation, leaving notable gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week