Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to openproject-lite-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes the OpenProject REST API as MCP tools for project management, including creating and managing projects, work packages, relations, attachments, users, notifications, watchers, boards, and reference data.
      37
      52 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to interact with OpenProject API v3 for project management, including creating and managing work packages, projects, comments, time entries, boards, and user dashboards.
      52 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with OpenProject's API v3 for comprehensive project management operations including work packages, projects, time tracking, users, and all other OpenProject features through natural language.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications to interact with OpenProject for project management, work package tracking, and task creation.
      91
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: listing, searching, reading, creating, updating, commenting, relating, time logging, deleting, and context lookup. The ls/find pair is the closest overlap, but the distinction between unfiltered listing and text search is explicit. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The names consistently use a terse lowercase CLI-style convention, which is predictable within this server. There are minor deviations in whether a token is a verb (new, find) or an abbreviation (cm, rel, tm, cx), but the overall style is cohesive.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for a lite work-package management server, and each tool corresponds to a meaningful workflow. There is no obvious redundancy or missing filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core work-package lifecycle: discovery, reading, creation, updates, comments, relations, time tracking, deletion, and context lookup. Minor gaps remain around attachments, watchers, and project administration, but these are reasonable omissions for a lite server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues