Skip to main content
Glama
alludium

Affinity MCP Server

by alludium

Get Opportunity

affinity_get_opportunity
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a single opportunity's basic details including ID, name, and associated list ID from Affinity CRM using the opportunity ID.

Instructions

Get a single opportunity by ID from Affinity CRM.

Returns basic opportunity info only (id, name, listId).

Returns (JSON): { "id": number, // Opportunity ID "name": string, // Opportunity name "listId": number // The list this opportunity belongs to }

Important: To get field data (Status, Amount, Owners, etc.), use affinity_get_list_entries with the opportunity's listId and fieldTypes: ["list"].

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
opportunityIdYesOpportunity ID (numeric). Get IDs from affinity_list_opportunities.
responseFormatNoOutput format: "json" for structured data or "markdown" for human-readable. Default: "json"
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (readOnlyHint, etc.) are consistent; description adds specific return fields and constraints (no field data), going beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences including a code block; purpose first, then returns, then important note. No extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Complete for a simple get-by-ID tool: explains purpose, return format, limitations, and points to the right tool for more data.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with good descriptions; the description adds return format context (JSON example) but doesn't significantly enhance parameter meaning beyond schema baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Get a single opportunity by ID from Affinity CRM' with explicit resource, action, and identifier. Return fields listed, distinguishing from siblings like list and get_list_entries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly notes 'Returns basic opportunity info only' and directs to affinity_get_list_entries for field data, providing clear when-to-use and alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alludium/affinity-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server