**MCP System Info Serverは、**リアルタイムのシステム情報を提供する軽量かつ効率的なサーバーです。CPU、メモリ、ディスク、GPUの統計情報など、さまざまなハードウェアおよびシステムの詳細情報を取得するため、監視や診断に役立ちます。
Related MCP server: MCP System Info Server
システム情報
システム名
ノード名
OSリリース
OSバージョン
マシンタイプ
プロセッサ
CPU情報
プロセッサ名
物理コア
論理コア
メモリ情報
合計メモリ
使用可能なメモリ
使用メモリ
メモリ使用率
ディスク情報
合計ディスク容量
使用済みディスク容量
空きディスク容量
ディスクスペースの使用率
GPU情報
GPU ID
GPU名
ドライバーバージョン
合計GPUメモリ
空きGPUメモリ
使用済みGPUメモリ
GPU負荷
GPU温度
リポジトリをクローンします。
git clone https://github.com/allenbijo/mcp-sysinfo.gitMCP サーバーをクライアントに追加します。
クロードについて
{
"mcpServers": {
"sysinfo": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
"D:\\WorksOfGreatness\\mcp-sysinfo",
"run",
"sysinfo.py"
]
}
}
}サーバーが起動し、受信リクエストをリッスンして、リアルタイムのシステム情報を提供します。
終点 | 説明 |
| システムの詳細を返します |
このプロジェクトは MIT ライセンスに基づいてライセンスされています。
アレン・ビジョ - GitHub
Get the current system information. Gives system information such as System, Node name, Release, Version, Machine, Processor CPU Information such as Processor, Physical Cores, Logical Cores Memory Information such as Total Memory, Available Memory, Used Memory, Memory Utilization Disk Information such as Total Disk Space, Used Disk Space, Free Disk Space, Disk Space Utilization
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It clearly describes the tool's read-only behavior and the types of information returned, but lacks details on performance, rate limits, or error handling. It adequately covers the core behavior without rich contextual disclosures.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured and front-loaded with the main purpose, followed by categorized details. It is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity, though some redundancy in listing information types could be slightly condensed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (0 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description provides complete context on what information is retrieved. It adequately compensates for the lack of structured fields, though it doesn't specify output format or potential errors.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description appropriately focuses on the tool's purpose and output, not parameters, meeting the baseline for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific action ('Get') and resource ('current system information'), with detailed breakdowns of what information is included (System, Node name, CPU, Memory, Disk). It effectively distinguishes this tool's comprehensive scope from any hypothetical alternatives.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving system information, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., specific vs. partial system info tools). Since there are no sibling tools, this is adequate but lacks explicit context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
get_sysinfoScored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool 'get_sysinfo' has a clear and distinct purpose of retrieving comprehensive system information, making it impossible for an agent to misselect among tools.
Since there is only one tool, it inherently follows a consistent naming pattern. The name 'get_sysinfo' uses a verb_noun format that is clear and predictable, and there are no other tools to compare it against for inconsistency.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'MCP System Info Server', which suggests a broader scope for system information retrieval. While 'get_sysinfo' provides comprehensive data, the lack of additional tools (e.g., for specific components like CPU, memory, or disk details) makes the set feel thin and underdeveloped for the domain.
The tool 'get_sysinfo' covers a wide range of system information in one call, but the server's purpose implies potential for more granular operations. There are significant gaps, such as no tools for querying specific system metrics separately (e.g., get_cpu_info, get_memory_usage) or performing actions like monitoring changes, which limits agent flexibility and could lead to inefficiencies.
CPU telemetry & benchmarking, SHA-256 hashing, AES-256-GCM storage, AI video/image via Nova.
Live health and AI-readable metadata of invokera.com. Demo of an Invokera-hosted MCP server.
QuLab MCP remote server (Streamable HTTP) for computational science and lab tools.
Real-time infrastructure monitoring with metrics, logs, alerts, and ML-based anomaly detection.
