Skip to main content
Glama

resume_deployment_schedule

Restart a paused deployment schedule in Prefect workflow automation to resume automated flow executions based on the defined schedule.

Instructions

Resume a deployment's schedule.

Args: deployment_id: The deployment UUID

Returns: Confirmation message

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
deployment_idYes

Implementation Reference

  • The primary handler implementation for the 'resume_deployment_schedule' MCP tool. Decorated with @mcp.tool for automatic registration. Input schema defined by function arguments (deployment_id: str). Executes Prefect client call to resume the deployment schedule and returns a text confirmation message.
    @mcp.tool
    async def resume_deployment_schedule(
        deployment_id: str,
    ) -> List[Union[types.TextContent, types.ImageContent, types.EmbeddedResource]]:
        """
        Resume a deployment's schedule.
        
        Args:
            deployment_id: The deployment UUID
            
        Returns:
            Confirmation message
        """
        async with get_client() as client:
            await client.resume_deployment_schedule(UUID(deployment_id))
            
            return [types.TextContent(type="text", text=f"Schedule for deployment '{deployment_id}' resumed successfully.")]
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the action ('Resume') and a return ('Confirmation message'), but fails to detail critical traits like required permissions, whether this is a mutating operation, potential side effects, or error conditions. This leaves significant gaps for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose in the first sentence, followed by structured sections for args and returns. It avoids unnecessary elaboration, though the 'Args' and 'Returns' labels add slight redundancy. Overall, it's efficiently sized for its content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's mutating nature (implied by 'resume'), lack of annotations, no output schema, and low schema coverage, the description is incomplete. It misses details on behavioral context, error handling, and interaction with sibling tools like 'pause_deployment_schedule', making it inadequate for safe and effective use by an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds minimal value by specifying 'deployment_id: The deployment UUID', which clarifies the parameter's purpose beyond the schema's basic type. However, it doesn't explain format details or constraints, and with only one parameter, the baseline is higher, but the description doesn't fully compensate for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Resume') and resource ('a deployment's schedule'), making the purpose understandable. It distinguishes this tool from siblings like 'pause_deployment_schedule' by specifying the opposite action, though it doesn't explicitly mention this contrast. The description avoids tautology by not merely restating the tool name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as 'pause_deployment_schedule' or 'set_deployment_schedule', nor does it mention prerequisites like whether the deployment must be paused first. It lacks explicit context for usage decisions, relying solely on the verb 'resume' to imply its role.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/allen-munsch/mcp-prefect'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server